|
Carbon Capture and the Climate Crisis: Can Removing CO2 from Energy Emissions - or Directly from the Air Itself - Mitigate Climate Change?
Register Now
Meanwhile, efforts to scrub CO2 from emissions at coal, oil, and natural gas plants have already received some attention. How advanced and widespread are those projects, and what kind of impact can we expect from this form of carbon capture? Join us as we examine the questions around both a potentially important climate solution and an expanding business space:
FEATURING...
|
|
|
Don't miss other free events from The Energy Collective:
Energy Risk and the End of Coal: What does the closing of coal fired
power plants mean for baseload power?
Is there enough natural gas that is findable and deliverable to plug most of the gap created by the projected closure of 25.5 gigawatts (GW) of U.S. generating capacity between now and year-end 2015? Join us our upcoming webcast to explore why we are closing 25 so much generating capacity such a short time, how much new natural gas is needed to fill the gap, and whether the necessary pipeline capacity is available to transport it. Register now! |
|
|
| |
Thursday, September 6, 2012
Energy Collective Webinar: Carbon Capture and the Climate Crisis
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide is undoubtedly increasing climate warmth. However I suspect that also an equally great or greater affect on warmth is the baring of soil by increase in annual crop acreage, roads, buildings, grazing, and desertification currently, especially in the tropics and subtropics. This may be a considerable part of the reason why the southwestern USA tends to be warmer than the southeast. You may see an article that briefly discusses this in more detail in http://charles_w.tripod.com/climate.html . If you see any possible improvement or errors, please let me know.
ReplyDeleteI suspect that shrubs in the Arctic have the opposite affect.
I see no reason why many climate water problems can not be much ameliorated by intelligent management of water both before and after the water reaches the soil, including pumping it into water tables through large, clean gravel filled deep holes. Rhode Island pumps whole rivers into the ocean during a flood, so the pumps already exist. I suspect that such a technique could be used to flush salt or poisons out of ground water also if designed right.
Our management of water is very important. There is no reason why we should allow huge volumes of water to flop down and flow unimpeded across farms down stream, destroying them, while adjacent areas shrivel up by drought. There are huge pumps that can easily prevent this. Allowing river water to flow into the ocean from any country relying on ground water is not very intelligent either.
Sincerely, Charles Weber