Next Monday, the state of New York may make climate change history.
because the state’s Public Service Commission will vote on a measure
that would not only prevent three nuclear power plants from being
replaced by fossil fuels, it would also establish an important precedent
that could be replicated across the U.S. and even Europe.
will be at the meeting in Albany, New York, along with other
pro-nuclear environmentalists organized by Environmental Progress (EP),
to encourage the Commissioners to do the right thing.
Climate scientists and environmentalists organized by EP have over the last several months been
championing the inclusion of nuclear in state Clean Energy Standards
(CES) as a fair and equitable way to protect America’s largest source of
If the Commissioners do the right thing, we will toast them along with Governor Andrew Cuomo and all other parties for making New York a climate change leader.
after that, we will drive three hours to the northwest to toast an even
more special group of people: the workers of the Fitzpatrick nuclear
How Fitzpatrick Fought Back
the CES becomes law, Fitzpatrick — known locally as just “Fitz” — which
had been written off as dead, will likely survive. Discriminated
against by federal and state policies, the plant’s operator, Entergy,
announced it would have to close the plant by January 2017.
when the operator of a nuclear plant announces a closure, the workers
just give up. Doing so is perfectly understandable: why try to keep a
nuclear plant open that its operator plainly no longer wants?
that wasn’t the reaction from Fitzpatrick workers. Instead, they fought
back. They organized rallies, pressured their elected officials to
intervene, and even attacked the plant's operator, Entergy.
The head of the local union, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW Local 97) Ted Skerpon blasted Entergy,
saying it was "using the FitzPatrick plant as a chip'' to pressure Gov.
Cuomo to stop trying to shut down Indian Point, a more profitable
nuclear plant near to Manhattan.
tell me it wasn't just a ploy,'' Skerpon told a reporter. "And if it
wasn't, you know what, Entergy, step up and tell us what you were asking
for. You're still hiding it. What are you asking for? What do you
union, the local community and elected officials pressured Entergy and
the Governor's office to return to the negotiating table. But talks
again broke down.
"It's Final," a local newspaper reported bluntly. "The fate of the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant in Oswego County has been decided. It will close."
Spath, a nuclear engineer who used to work at Fitz but now works at
neighboring Ginna, which will also be closed if the CES does not pass next Monday, spoke out eloquently for ending the discrimination against nuclear in New York, and again in California.
“I am a life-long lover of Mother Earth and a whole-hearted soldier for sustainability," Spath said in video testimony posted to Facebook that has since been viewed 30,000 times.
Cuomo wanted to exclude Indian Point from the Clean Energy Standard for
supposed safety reasons. The discriminatory treatment of Indian Point
was hotly opposed by pro-nuclear environmentalists, including
Climate Scientists & Environmentalists Defend Indian Point
early April, while campaigning in New York, Democratic presidential
candidate Bernie Sanders called for closing Indian Point, which
anti-nuclear groups have long sought to close.
last few weeks have seen an orchestrated campaign to mislead the people
of New York about the essential safety and importance of Indian Point
nuclear plant to address climate change. The Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has repeatedly certified the safety of Indian Point.
The scaremongers have taken minor maintenance questions and wrongly
suggested they point to significant problems with the plant."
few days later, Environmental Progress challenged Cuomo's staff on its
proposal to protect nuclear plants but exclude nuclear. “How does the
governor justify supporting only the upstate nuclear power plants and
not Indian Point,” Cesar Penafiel, Director of Analytics at
Environmental Progress, asked Richard Kauffman, Cuomo's energy czar at meeting last April.
Then, in early June, EP sent an open letter to Cuomo signed
by Hansen and dozens of respected climate scientists and
environmentalists. We praised Cuomo's CES while criticizing his
exclusion of Indian Point:
with climate change requires that 100 percent of our electricity derive
from clean, low-carbon energy sources. We thus applaud your efforts to
include nuclear in a new, clean energy standard (CES).... At the same
time, we are troubled by your efforts to close the Indian Point nuclear
plant and to exclude it from the CES."
We debunked the alleged safety concerns with Indian Point one by one. We concluded by noting:
remains the safest way to make reliable clean energy according to every
major scientific review, and yet it is treated as though the opposite
were the case. All power plants require monitoring and maintenance but
only nuclear plants attract the attention of policymakers and the media.
The justification for the double standard is that nuclear is uniquely
dangerous but all of the data, including of the worst accidents, show
the opposite to be true."
it's not exactly clear how it might have affected the final outcome, it
is notable that in June and July, Gov. Cuomo's plans for a major solar
manufacturing push in upstate New York were unraveling. After the US
Justice Department announced an investigation of alleged corruption, IBM and a major Japanese investor put on hold over $1.5 billion in investments, including in a Solar City manufacturing facility.
Finally, on July 8, the staff of the New York PSC released a revised Clean Energy Standard proposal that includes Indian Point.
The following week, Entergy announced that it was in discussions with Exelon to sell Fitz, contingent upon passage of the revised CES.
CES is by no means a done deal. It is being opposed by the usual
suspects, including the Sierra Club, NRDC and Riverkeeper — both of whom
take money from energy corporations that stand to benefit from closing
New York nuclear plants.
If they do the right thing for the climate and New York, there will be plenty of credit to go around.
Commissioners and Gov. Cuomo will deserve credit for siding with the
climate and communities against fear mongering special interest groups
like Sierra Club and Riverkeeper.
and Exelon will deserve credit for working out a win-win deal and
transcending the scarcity mentality that accompanies low electricity
scientists — particularly Jim Hansen — and pro-nuclear
environmentalists will deserve credit for standing up for the science
against the anti-nuclear lobby not just in Albany but also Springfield,
Sacramento and Washington, D.C.
in the end, I think special credit should go to the courageous workers
of Fitz, supportive elected officials, IBEW 97, the Building Trades and
the Oswego Industrial Development Agency. Had they given up, then so too
might have Gov. Cuomo, Entergy and Exelon.
recognition of their leadership — a model of courage and tenacity for
struggling nuclear plant workers and communities around the country —
Environmental Progress will travel to Oswego to give the workers and
their leaders the James Hansen Climate Courage Award.
The first round of beers for Fitz and other nuclear power plant workers at Greene's Ale House next Monday, August 1, will be on me.