by Mark Flanagan
We
promise not to beat the horse until it starts beating us – and we’re
probably close to that point – but say, how is that shift to renewable
energy
going in Germany?
The country’s third-largest aluminum producer, Voerde Aluminium GmbH,
filed for bankruptcy amidst trade groups advocating affordable power.
Ulrich Grillo, president of Germany’s non-ferrous metals association,
views Voerde Aluminium’s insolvency as proof that the metal
manufacturing industry in Germany is endangered by high electricity
costs, which are no longer competitive on the international level.
By point of comparison:
Electricity
prices for industrial use are 41.7 percent lower in France than in
Germany. If similar inefficiencies begin to surface in steel and other
critical manufacturing industries, the impact on the German economy will
be significant.
Let’s be fair: Germany generated
(in 2010) about the same amount of electricity via nuclear energy –
about 22 percent – as the United States does and half the nuclear plants
there are still chugging along until 2022. Germany gets about 43
percent of generation from coal. It’s move to renewable energy is meant
to impact the coal percentage as well as get nuclear to zero. What’s
hurting here the impact that move is having on ratepayers and,
obviously, the industrial sector.
In an interview
with Uranium Investing News, Edward Kee, vice president of NERA
Economic Consulting, offered his opinion on the current policy dynamics,
commenting, “before all German nuclear plants are permanently closed,
the policy will shift and some of these nuclear power plants will remain
in service. However, this view is based on fundamental economics and
not by the less-predictable politics.”
Anyone can say anything, of course, but that doesn’t mean we can’t like some of what they say –
NERA
doesn’t seem to have any particular ideological or pro-nuclear
inclination, so it’s just making an economic assessment. We’ll see in a
decade or so how that works out.
No comments:
Post a Comment