Congressional Research Service Report Released: Biomass: Comparison of Definitions in Legislation Through the 112th Congress
The Congressional Research Service (CRS), the public policy research arm of Congress, just issued the report Biomass: Comparison of Definitions in Legislation Through the 112th Congress (Nov. 14, 2012). The 20-page report authored by Kelsi Bracmort discusses the following:
Summary
The
use of biomass as an energy feedstock is emerging as a potentially
viable alternative to address U.S. energy security concerns, foreign oil
dependence, rural economic development, and diminishing sources of
conventional energy. Biomass (organic matter that can be converted into
energy) may include food crops, crops for energy (e.g., switchgrass or
prairie perennials), crop residues, wood waste and byproducts, and
animal manure. Most legislation involving biomass has focused on
encouraging the production of liquid fuels from corn. Efforts to promote
the use of biomass for power generation have focused on wood, wood
residues, and milling waste. Comparatively less emphasis has been placed
on the use of non-corn-based biomass feedstocks—other food crops,
non-food crops, crop residues, animal manure, and more—as renewable
energy sources for liquid fuel use or for power generation. This is
partly due to the variety, lack of availability, and dispersed location
of non-corn-based biomass feedstock. The technology development status
and costs to convert non-corn-based biomass into energy are also viewed
by some as an obstacle to rapid technology deployment.
For over 30 years, the term biomass has been a part of legislation enacted by Congress for various programs,
indicating some interest by the general public and policymakers in
expanding its use. To aid understanding of why U.S. consumers, utility
groups, refinery managers, and others have not fully adopted biomass as
an energy resource, this report investigates the characterization of
biomass in legislation. The definition of biomass has evolved over time,
most notably since 2004. The report lists biomass definitions enacted
by Congress in legislation and the tax code since 2004 and definitions
contained in legislation from the 111thCongress (the American Clean
Energy and
Security Act of 2009, H.R. 2454; the American Clean Energy Leadership
Act of 2009, S.1462; the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act, S.
1733; and the discussion draft of the American Power Act). Comments on
the similarities and differences among the definitions are provided. One
point of contention regarding the definition is the inclusion of
biomass from federal lands. Some argue that removal of biomass from
these lands may lead to ecological harm. Others contend that biomass
from federal lands can aid the production of renewable energy to meet
certain mandates (e.g., the Renewable Fuel Standard) and that removal
of biomass can enhance forest protection from wildfires. Factors that
may prevent a private landowner from rapidly entering the biomass
feedstock market are also included in the report.
Bills
were introduced in the 112th Congress that would modify the biomass
definition (e.g., S.781, H.R. 1861). However, debates about the
definition have not been as extensive in the 112th Congress
as they were in previous Congresses. Forthcoming discussions about
energy,particularly legislation involving the Renewable Fuel Standard or
energy tax incentives, may prompt further discussion about the
definition of biomass.
No comments:
Post a Comment