Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Stretches of Upper Mississippi River near record-low levels

 

Stretches of Upper Mississippi River near record-low levels

Graph of Mississippi River water levels, as explained in the article text
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, based on the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service's Advanced Hydrologic Prediction Service.
Note: Forecast as of 5:00 p.m. EST, January 29, 2013 based on current rainfall projections. A river stage of zero would be considered near the historic normal for that river gauge, while flood stage is declared at a river stage of 30 feet.

As a result of last year's drought, stretches of the Upper Mississippi River have approached record lows. These low water levels have jeopardized commercial barge traffic shipping agricultural and energy commodities on the river. Recent rock blasting and dredging by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and rainfall in the near-term forecast are expected to provide some relief. Key energy commodities transported via Mississippi River barges are coal and, increasingly, crude oil and distillate fuel oil.
Large stretches of the Upper Mississippi have seen low water levels, although for the most part the Lower Mississippi River Basin (after the confluence of the Ohio and Mississippi rivers, near the Missouri, Illinois, and Kentucky borders) has remained at normal water levels. When levels start to drop below certain points, barge traffic is slowed because of congestion in the narrower portion of the river that remains navigable.
Crude Oil and Petroleum Products
While the Mississippi River has long been an important waterway for U.S. commerce, its importance to oil markets is growing. Crude oil movements by barge and tanker between the Midwest (PADD 2) and Gulf Coast (PADD 3) in both directions averaged 55,000 barrels per day (bbl/d) during January through October 2012, up 14,000 bbl/d from the same period last year while petroleum product movements were down 11,000 bbl/d to 182,000 bbl/d.
In 2007, only 5,000 bbl/d of crude and 71,000 bbl/d of petroleum products, including fuel ethanol, moved on tankers and barges from the Midwest to the Gulf Coast. The growth in waterborne movements began in 2010 and was driven by increases in product movements because Midwest refineries with access to discounted crude oil increased the volume of crude oil processed; however, with limited product pipeline capacity from PADD 2 to PADD 3, those refineries turned to alternative modes of transportation to move their products. The growth in 2011 and 2012 waterborne shipments was driven by crude oil movements as production of crude oil in PADD 2 outpaced pipeline capacity growth and producers looked for alternative ways to move growing crude oil volumes to refining centers on the U.S. Gulf Coast.
Graph of waterborne movements, as explained in the article text
Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Petroleum Navigator.

Waterborne movements in the opposite direction, from the Gulf Coast to the Midwest, consist mostly of petroleum products. Waterborne movement of crude oil from PADD 3 to PADD 2 was seen in only two months between January 2011 and October 2012. In general, after peaking at 162,000 bbl/d in March 2010, volumes of waterborne petroleum products moving north, mostly on the Mississippi River, have been declining. The January 16 edition of This Week In Petroleum included a detailed analysis of crude oil shipments from PADD 2 to PADD 3.
Coal
Barge traffic is highly ranked (behind rail) as the most frequent transport mode for coal headed to electric power plants in the United States. The Mississippi River also is a key transport mode for coal being delivered to export terminals in New Orleans.
As with flooding in the spring of 2011, the disruptions in barge traffic have not had a material effect on coal supplies at electric power plants yet. Stockpiles of coal at electric power plants remain elevated because of increased competition between natural gas and coal for power generation as well as a warm winter, providing ample supply of coal at electric power plants.

http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=9771

No comments:

Post a Comment