|
A group of 57 U.S. Nobel Laureates is urging members of Congress to preserve federal funding of long term scientific research for the 2014 fiscal year budget.
Today, President Obama released the FY2014 budget, which is sent to
Congress for approval and allocation. With sequestration cuts to
agencies which support scientific research and development including the
National Institutes of Health, the National Science Foundation, the
Department of Energy and the National Institute of Standards and
Technology, the United States is at risk of falling behind other
countries in the
development of science and technology.
The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) released the letter which was written by Dr. Burton Richter, winner of the 1976 Nobel Prize in physics, and signed by 57 U.S. Nobel Laureates, many of whom serve on FAS’s Board of Sponsors.
Dr. Richter writes that “there is a bipartisan agreement on the
importance of federal funding of long-term scientific research. The
agreement exists because of recognition that this sort of research fuels
the innovation engine that is essential to our
economy. The entire federal research, development and demonstration
enterprise amounts today to about one percent of our Gross Domestic
Product and has steadily fallen over the years, while our rivals in
Europe and Asia invest more.”
Dr. Richter
underscores the importance of long-term scientific funding for future
generations, stating that, “we Nobel Laureates are likely to do well in
competition for a reduced level of funding. Our concern is for the
younger generation who will be behind the innovations and earn the
Prizes of the future.”
“The United
States has far surpassed other nations in Nobel Prize winners in the
sciences. The ability to foster such talent will be undermined with
continued erosion of federal support,” said FAS President Charles D.
Ferguson. “FAS is proud to circulate this letter on behalf of Dr.
Richter and the Nobel Laureates to raise awareness of potential budget
cuts to the United States science industry and future generations of
scientists.”
Read the article in the New York Times regarding the letter here.
Letter:
Web version
PDF |
|
No comments:
Post a Comment