ANS needs your help with a response to the
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) proposed "Clean Power Plan
Rule," which seeks to achieve a 30% reduction in carbon emissions from
the U.S. electricity sector by 2030. By any objective measure, this
should be good for nuclear. However,
the rule as it is currently structured would almost entirely
discount the clean energy contributions of our current nuclear energy
facilities and effectively penalize states that have new plants under
construction.
Here's why: The EPA's proposal is based on
state-specific carbon limits, and its formula for calculating the
"baseline" emissions profile of each state specifically excludes current
nuclear plants. The EPA language allows an arbitrary 5.8% credit
toward compliance for maintaining current nuclear generating capacity.
This means individual states that may choose to close existing nuclear
plants need only replace 5.8% of the energy generated with clean sources
to
maintain the same level of compliance. The other 94.2% can be replaced
with sources producing more GHG than nuclear with no impact. By
comparison, 100 percent of current renewable energy generation (wind and
solar) is counted in EPA's baseline!
The EPA's treatment of nuclear plants under
construction is also unacceptable. Rather than rewarding states for
their proactive efforts to decarbonize with new nuclear, the EPA
includes the Vogtle, V.C. Summer and Watts Bar 2 projects in their
respective states' baseline calculation, thus requiring them to take
additional measures to comply with the regulation.
The ANS Policy Statement on climate change (ANS-44-2013) states that "
ANS supports policies designed to address carbon emission reductions that are performance-based and technology neutral." The current EPA proposal clearly fails that test.
It's time for America's nuclear professionals to join
the fight. We are not asking for handouts or subsidies, just a level
playing field on which to compete.
The EPA is seeking comments on the proposed rule
until December 1. I strongly urge you to
CLICK HERE immediately
and make your voice heard. We only have a short window to respond, and
the more ANS members weigh in, the louder our voices are, the more
likely we will be successful in changing this unfair rule.
More information is available on the ANS website at
ans.org/epa. Thank you for taking a few moments to join ANS in this united effort.
Regards,
Dr. Michaele (Mikey) Brady Raap
ANS President
|
No comments:
Post a Comment