Wednesday, June 3, 2015

CFR Update: U.S. Senate Curbs Post-9/11 Surveillance Program

TOP OF THE AGENDA
U.S. Senate Curbs Post-9/11 Surveillance Program
The U.S. Senate voted 67 to 32 on Tuesday to pass the USA Freedom Act (Guardian), which effectively ends the National Security Agency's controversial bulk phone collection program and replaces it with more stringent checks on the government's access to communication data. President Barack Obama signed the legislation shortly after Senate approval, ending a heated debate in Congress (WaPo) that saw many Republicans cross party lines to vote in favor of the law. The act marks the first legislative overhaul (Reuters) passed after former NSA contractor Edward Snowden exposed the agency's bulk collection of telephone records, enabled by certain provisions in the post-9/11 Patriot Act.
ANALYSIS
"To libertarians and civil liberties advocates, the shift underscores an evolution in thinking about the risks and trade-offs of terrorism, a recognition that perhaps the country went too far out of fear and anxiety. To national security conservatives, it represents a dangerous national amnesia about the altogether real dangers still confronting the country," writes Peter Baker for the New York Times.
"In the end, both sides in the political debate can claim a partial victory. Privacy advocates will be satisfied that bulk data collection is no longer in realm of 'Big Brother', and law enforcement agencies will still have the tools necessary to track suspected terrorists, albeit with the additional burden of having to obtain court orders for telephone metadata," writes Martin Reardon for Al Jazeera.
"And yet the behavior of the Republicans in the Senate,  particularly of the Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, in the past few weeks, has not only been an insult to the efforts of [Vermont Senator Patrick] Leahy and others, it has thrown the premise of the compromise—that with some tweaks, the N.S.A. can be trusted with broad access to Americans' phone records and metadata—into doubt," writes Amy Davidson for the New Yorker.

No comments:

Post a Comment