Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Arnie Gundersen on AP1000

In 2010, Arnie Gundersen released a report theorizing about a vulnerability of the ap1000 containment (attached). My summary at the time: http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/21/critics-challenge-safety-of-new-nuclear-reactor-design/?_r=0
I think he's wrong (and more importantly, the NRC thought he was wrong) but his complaint was at least within his area of expertise; his specialty was containments. 



Matthew L. Wald
202-997-5854

Post Accident AP1000 Containment Leakage
An Unreviewed Safety Issue


http://www.nonukesyall.org/pdfs/20100407-ap1000-gundersen-containment-report.pdf

Matt:

With due respect, Mr. Gundersen has a lengthy, publicly accessible resume that does not include any education or professional experience related to nuclear reactor containment design, construction, licensing or testing.


He’s written some reports and provided “expert” witness testimony on the topic, but the standards of acceptance for those venues are not all that challenging.

Mr. Gundersen has also claimed to have been a licensed reactor operator when the only license he ever held was for a 100 watt research reactor at RPI. He’s published reports on the effects of tritium and on the flaws in the San Onofre steam generator.

Rod Adams
Publisher, Atomic Insights

No comments:

Post a Comment