ANALYSIS
“As diplomats here work through the final points of a sweeping new climate change accord, experts said the ultimate measure of success of the agreement
will be whether it sends a clear signal to global financial investors
that they should move money away from fossil fuels and toward
clean-energy sources such as wind and solar power. Without that signal,
there is little chance that emissions will be reduced enough to stave
off the most catastrophic impacts of global warming,” writes Coral
Davenport for the New York Times.
“The
U.S. press, cartoonists included, has highlighted India as a hurdle at
best, spoiler at worst, to achieving a strong, effective agreement. The
Indian press has characterized the United States as a ‘bully’ unwilling
to make deeper emissions cuts at home but harshly pressing the poor to
do so, balking at more funding to help developing countries adapt to climate change, and resisting proposals for liability for future environmental damage,” writes CFR's Alyssa Ayres.
“The
Paris meeting to negotiate a climate agreement is about spirit and
trust as much as any specific numerical emissions target. This is
because whatever the delegates are prepared to agree to in Paris will
not, on its own, slow warming fast enough to keep us safe. This doesn’t
mean humanity is doomed. But it does mean that negotiators need to reach an agreement
that fosters a level of trust and a spirit of urgent optimism to raise
our ambition after Paris, both as the Paris agreement evolves in the
coming years, and, immediately, through other national and international
venues,” write Mario Molina and Durwood Zaelke for CFR .
|
No comments:
Post a Comment