Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Defjining nuclear terrorism

Defining nuclear terrorism
What is nuclear terrorism, and just how big a threat does it pose? Since European authorities revealed that the group behind the November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks was also spying on a senior nuclear official in Belgium, the phrase “nuclear terrorism” has burst back on the public scene. But as Bulletin contributing editor Elisabeth Eaves explains, media stories sometimes fail to distinguish among events that would look completely different from one another, if they ever did come to pass.

What does “nuclear terrorism” really mean? by Elisabeth Eaves

More background:

Matthew Bunn, William Tobey, and other experts from Harvard's Belfer Center provide a "global reality check" on efforts to secure vulnerable nuclear weapons material.

Hui Zhang writes that China needs to improve its legal framework on nuclear security.

Frank von Hippel, Zia Mian, and Michael Schoeppner think banning highly enriched uranium (HEU) would make the world safer from nuclear terrorism.

In an interview with Sam Nunn, the former senator and current co-chair of the Nuclear Threat Initiative explains the slowing progress of safeguarding nuclear materials.

Bulletin editor John Mecklin compiled a Nuclear Security Summit primer.

Over the next week, we'll be adding new posts to our debate about how much the summits have accomplished.


Keep reading the Bulletin to stay up to date on the latest in nuclear security.

No comments:

Post a Comment