It's about value (and the future)
In
this post, John Dobken compares the cost and value of a proposed wind
farm (intermittent energy, heavy taxpayer subsidies, six to ten
permanent jobs) with the cost and value of a nuclear plant (steady
energy, very little subsidy, 1500 jobs at two plants). He calculates
that a nuclear subsidy of less than half the value of a wind subsidy
would keep nuclear plants operating. A nuclear subsidy would be a far
better use of government money than the wind subsidies: both for the
ecology and for the economy. https://northwestcleanenergy.com/2016/05/19/its-about-value-and-the-future/
No comments:
Post a Comment