SEPTEMBER 6, 2013—I have
received encouraging feedback and questions to the first column, and
would like to express my sincere thanks for your kind support; please
excuse me for not responding to those directly through email, Twitter,
or Facebook. I will try to respond to your questions in my updates.
Update:
As of today, the highest radiation level detected near the tanks is now
2,200 millisieverts per hour, up from the 1,800 millisieverts per hour
that I reported yesterday.
On September 3, 2013, Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) and the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI)
announced
the following three principle countermeasures against the ongoing
contaminated water crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power
Station: removing the source of contamination, isolating ground water
from the contamination, and preventing any leaks of the contaminated
water. But there are major challenges to the countermeasures that are
currently employed or that planned to be employed. These issues are as
follows:
Removing the source of contamination. On August 22, Tepco started pumping contaminated water from the trench and will have this water isolated by the end of
October.
The multi-nuclide removal equipment—known as the Advanced Liquid
Processing System, or ALPS—has three lines and a daily capacity of 750
tons; currently, it is undergoing a “hot test,” which means that the
facility uses radioactive materials during the test run. However, two of
its three lines are currently shutdown due to technical problems. While
ALPS was planned to begin full-scale operation by the end of September,
it remains uncertain if this will happen; this is why the government
decided to provide financial support for a second and improved facility,
which will have a similar function as ALPS, but has not yet been named.
Isolating groundwater from the contamination.
On July 8, Tepco started injecting sodium silicate into the ground; the
company completed enclosing the soil between units 1 and 2 on August
10. Tepco also started enclosing the soil between units 2 and 3 as well
as units 3 and 4—the completion date is planned for October. Tepco will
examine a freezing method to block the water flow between the turbine
buildings and the trenches. This is an expensive operation (first
suggested by the government's accident response office in April of 2011,
but rejected by Tepco due to high costs); therefore, the government has
decided to provide financial support for the effort.
Preventing leakage of the contaminated water.
Tepco has installed wells—located near the reactor building that faces
the mountains—to pump up groundwater so that the water will not flow
into the reactor buildings. The company is currently negotiating with
local residents and the fishing industry on the details surrounding the
startup of these wells. On September 5, Tepco found that the underground
water taken from the wells was contaminated—650 becquerel per
liter—which implies that contaminated water may have leached into the
underground water; heavy rainfalls this summer likely influenced this.
Bypassing the underground water may not be effective if it already has
been contaminated. Exact routes and the scale of contamination are still
not known.
###
SEPTEMBER 5, 2013—Given the increased
concern over the contaminated water leak at the Fukushima Daiichi
Nuclear Power Station, I will resume my online column to provide
frequent updates of the situation at Fukushima.
As the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI) summarizes,
the events at the Fukushima Daiichi station picked up again on June 19,
2013, when Tepco announced that groundwater was contaminated with
radioactive materials in the area between the turbine buildings and the
plant port. The next month, on July 22, some of this contaminated water
seeped into the plant port, though the radioactive materials that were
found there and in the ocean were below the detection limit.
Nevertheless, the Ministry announced that countermeasures be imposed,
including the removal of the contamination source; isolation of the
ground water from the contamination source; and overall leak prevention
of the contaminated water.
Tepco responded,
agreeing, within two years, to enclose the contaminated soil with
sodium silicate walls, pump out the contaminated water from the trenches
and isolate them, and bypass groundwater.
But
last month, on August 18, Tepco discovered that contaminated water has
leaked from above-ground storage tanks into the surrounding soil, which
prompted the Nuclear Regulation Authority to rate this event as a three on the International Nuclear Event Scale—an action that made headlines around the world.
On
August 26, the Ministry directed Tepco to enhance management of the
tanks and the surrounding area; reinforce patrols; accelerate
replacement from bolted joint tanks to welded joint tanks; accelerate
the highly-contaminated water treatment and decrease the radiation dose
of the surrounding area by collecting the contaminated soil; and
identify the risks of storing highly-contaminated water and take actions
against the risks.
Today, there are three important issues to consider and follow:
1)
Highly contaminated water—containing tritium, strontium 90, and cesium
137—was detected leaking from the plant, possibly from the trench. Over
the past two years, it is estimated that strontium 90 and cesium 137
discharged from the plant at about 100 times their annual levels,
whereas tritium discharged at about two times its annual rate.
2)
About 1,000 tons of underground water is estimated to flow into the
site on a daily basis, out of which 400 tons flows daily into the
reactor and turbine buildings, i.e. mixed with contaminated water. Water
is circulated for core cooling, and contaminated excess water has been
stored in tanks. The water decontamination facility has not been
functioning due to operational issues. Leaks have been found in various
tanks that store about 340,000 tons of contaminated water; the current
storage capacity is about 400,000 tons. Replacing these tanks with
welded tanks instead of bolted tanks currently employed will take time,
and monitoring efforts have been intensified. The highest level of
radioactive materials leaked is 1,800 millisieverts per hour (mostly
beta ray, only 1 millisievert per hour for
gamma ray,
as of September 3). It cannot be denied that contaminated water from
these tanks might have leaked into the sea; though this has not yet been
confirmed.
3) So far, the sea near
the site and outside the port do not show a significant increase in
radioactivity. Nevertheless, on September 1, the local fishing industry
decided to stop test fishing—that is, fishing on a limited, not
commercial, scale and testing the fish for radioactivity; test fishing
had been conducted since June 2012.
Last month, the Japanese government announced it would involve itself in the events at Fukushima, and announced on September 3 the various measures it would pursue to deal with this ongoing crisis, such as: establish
an inter-minister level council; establish an inter-governmental
liaison office near Tepco’s Fukushima site; establish an
inter-governmental council for coordination near the Fukushima site;
provide $470 million in financial support (to install a frozen soil
wall, estimated at $320 million and provide multi-nuclide removal
equipment, priced at $150 million); enhance monitoring and risk
management efforts
The total cost of decontaminating the Fukushima Daiichi site is currently estimated to be around $10 billion.