Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire - Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry. Nuclear Activities
Wednesday, July 29, 2026
Tuesday, July 28, 2026
Leaked document reveals White House nuclear waste plan - E&E News by POLITICO
Leaked document reveals White House nuclear waste plan - E&E News by POLITICO
Guest Post: HEATMAP
ALEXANDER C. KAUFMAN • JULY 28, 2026
Trump may finally move the U.S. on from Yucca Mountain
Nuclear waste is a political paradox. Critics of atomic energy say that the radioactive waste produced during fission cancel out the benefits of using the most efficient source of carbon-free power humanity has yet harnessed. In the 1980s, the federal government took control of nuclear waste and set about building the world’s first permanent repository to store spent fuel underground for centuries. Yucca Mountain in Nevada was designated as the debut location for such a facility. Opponents in the Silver State fought back, imagining that Washington was subjecting Nevada to dangers akin to the atomic bomb tests that once took place in its deserts. In 2010 — in a move that nonpartisan Government Accountability Office later pegged as an entirely political, rather than technical, motive — President Barack Obama halted work on a project the then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wanted kiboshed. The problem is that federal law dictates Yucca Mountain be completed as the first nuclear waste repository before other sites can be considered. No one in Congress has stepped up to make the change. As a result, the U.S. — operator of the world’s largest nuclear fleet and wannabe exporter to countries who want to get into the atomic energy game — has had no clear long-term plan for dealing with nuclear waste in 16 years.
The Trump administration is trying to change that. The Department of Energy has floated plans for nuclear innovation campuses where cutting-edge recycling companies could test out new technologies to reprocess waste into medical isotopes and fresh fuel. But E&E News reported Monday that the administration is poised to press Congress to update federal law to allow the U.S. to finally move on from Yucca Mountain. A leaked document the newswire obtained outlines the administration’s plans to instead press states to take on waste repositories and recycling facilities, in line with the Energy Department’s campus idea. That may not be easy. Even Texas, whose government has sought to roll out the red carpet for nuclear developers recently unsuccessfully sued federal regulators to the Supreme Court to block construction of a waste storage facility.
Monday, July 27, 2026
Sunday, July 26, 2026
Saturday, July 25, 2026
Friday, July 24, 2026
Thursday, July 23, 2026
Wednesday, July 22, 2026
Saudis Reach Deal With U.S. That Could Let Them Enrich Nuclear Fuel - Guest Post
Saudis Reach Deal With U.S. That Could Let Them Enrich Nuclear Fuel - nytimes.com-Saudis Reach Deal With US That Could Let Them Enrich Nuclear Fuel.pdf
David E. Sanger, Edward Wong, William J. Broad July 22, 2026
Saudis Reach Deal With U.S. That Could Let Them Enrich
Nuclear Fuel
nytimes.com/2026/07/21/us/politics/trump-saudi-nuclear-deal.html
By David E. SangerEdward Wong and William J. Broad
David Sanger reported from Washington, Edward Wong from Manila, where he is covering a
diplomatic trip by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and William J. Broad from New York.
The Trump administration plans to announce Wednesday that it has reached a broad nuclear
agreement with Saudi Arabia that could lead to the country enriching its own fuel for nuclear
reactors, U.S. officials said.
The accord is intended to further bind the United States with the Saudi government as the war
with Iran strains the relationship. The Trump administration, according to officials, estimates it
will provide billions of dollars for the U.S. nuclear industry — starting with Westinghouse,
which designs many of the reactors sold abroad.
The Trump administration plans to formally sign and announce the agreement with the Saudis
on Wednesday, said two U.S. officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss
sensitive diplomacy. It would announce the details to Congress soon afterward.
Although the agreement likely would have support among many Republicans, some U.S.
lawmakers from both parties along with Israeli officials have expressed opposition to such a
plan, fearing that the kingdom could use a civilian nuclear project to eventually develop
nuclear weapons.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters traveling with him in Manila on Wednesday that
he had nothing to say about any nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia. “Maybe later today,
once Washington wakes up, there is an announcement,” he said. “I promise you’ll know about
it.”
Asked about concerns that the agreement could lead to Saudi Arabia developing nuclear
weapons, Mr. Rubio said, “Suffice it to say, the U.S. is not going to reach any agreement with
any country in the world that leads to the risk of proliferation.”
The accord has been under discussion for years, and during the Biden administration it was
envisioned as part of a broader deal that would include Saudi diplomatic recognition of Israel.
But after the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks on Israel by Hamas, that prospect receded. President
1/4
Trump separated the proposal for U.S.-Saudi civilian nuclear cooperation from any demand
that Saudi Arabia recognize Israel.
The agreement will require review by Congress, which under the Atomic Energy Act has the
power to vote a resolution of disapproval. But as a practical matter, the agreement would
likely pass, because Congress would have to assemble a veto-proof majority to override Mr.
Trump’s initiative.
Nonetheless, debate over the accord is likely to be fierce. To get the deal done with Crown
Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the country’s 40-year-old de facto leader, Mr. Trump had to
agree to terms that may limit international inspectors from going to any sites in the country
that they think could be a pathway to diverting fuel to weapons projects.And he agreed that,
after a joint study with Saudi Arabia on the economics of producing nuclear fuel, the Saudis
may be allowed to enrich uranium or reprocess plutonium on their soil.
The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday night that Mr. Trump had approved the agreement.
Prince Mohammed has vowed he would build nuclear weapons if Iran does so, even insisting
in one interview he would do so “without a doubt.”
Iran has had a nuclear program that it says is intended for civilian use, though it has enriched
uranium to near weapons grade following Mr. Trump’s withdrawal in 2018 from an Obama-era
nuclear deal. Mr. Trump then ordered U.S. forces to join with Israel to attack Iran’s nuclear
sites in June 2025, and to start a war against Iran this February.
Mr. Trump and Prince Mohammed agreed to proceed with U.S.-Saudi civilian nuclear
cooperation during a visit to the White House by the prince last November. U.S. and Saudi
officials have been in talks on a plan since then. They were finalizing the details this spring
and summer, and aimed to share the plan with Congress soon, The New York Times reported
earlier this month.
The agreement includes two secret side letters reached with the Saudis. The administration is
expected to argue they contain proprietary business information and deal with sensitive
national security issues. But some members of Congress may not be willing to vote for the
accord until the letters are all made public.
The type of deal that the Trump administration has reached with Saudi Arabia is called a 123
Agreement (pronounced 1-2-3), which establishes a legally binding framework between
nations on nuclear cooperation. The obligations of such an agreement are aimed at ensuring
2/4
non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. The United States has 26 such agreements with 51
governments and the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Mr. Trump’s concessions to the Saudis on the terms of the nuclear deal are significant. When
the United States entered into a similar agreement with the United Arab Emirates, which went
into force in 2009, there were far more restrictive conditions. The U.A.E. agreed to the
stringent inspections, signing what is called an “additional protocol” with the International
Atomic Energy Agency. And it agreed to forgo the right to produce its own fuel, cutting off the
possibility that it would have the infrastructure to produce a weapon.
That agreement became known as the “gold standard” for nuclear nonproliferation. And while
the administration plans to argue that it will have other restrictions in place — including joint
partnerships with the Saudis that will allow Washington to keep a close eye on the kingdom’s
program — the fact remains that Mr. Trump has retreated from the restrictions negotiated by
the Bush and Obama administrations.
While the bulk of the negotiations with the U.A.E. took place while President George W. Bush
was in office, it was finished by President Barack Obama and went into effect in 2009.
During the first Trump administration, Thomas J. Barrack Jr., a businessman and top fund-
raiser for Mr. Trump, proposed to the White House that U.S. companies, including his own
private equity firm, help Saudi Arabia build nuclear power plants. That proposal stalled, in part
because of Saudi reluctance to agree to American nonproliferation policies.
The Biden administration had talks with the Saudis on a civilian nuclear deal as part of a
proposal that would have the kingdom recognize Israel.
In April 2025, soon after Mr. Trump returned to office, Chris Wright, the energy secretary,
discussed a proposal with Prince Mohammed on a visit to the kingdom, six months before the
prince’s visit to Washington, U.S. officials said.
Mr. Trump and Prince Mohammed clashed in May over U.S. aggression in the Iran war. The
prince refused to let the U.S. military use Saudi airspace for an operation to escort
commercial tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran’s forces essentially control. The
civilian nuclear agreement helps put U.S.-Saudi relations on more stable ground again.
During the Biden administration, the United States and Saudi Arabia were also discussing a
mutual defense agreement, as part of the broad plan that would include nuclear cooperation
in exchange for Saudi recognition of Israel. The Saudis have long pressed U.S. officials for a
mutual defense agreement that would be ratified by the Senate, so that future American
3/4
presidents could not easily back out of one. Saudi officials wanted such an agreement in part
to deter against Iranian aggression.
Mr. Trump and Prince Mohammed reached an understanding during the White House meeting
last November on a defense arrangement between the two governments, which would include
the sale of advanced F-35 fighter jets to the kingdom. But that fell short of a treaty that the
administration would present to the Senate for ratification.
During the Iran war this year, Saudi Arabia has relied on the United States to provide
interceptor missiles for air defense against Iranian projectiles. However, Saudi officials have
concerns about whether American policy in the Middle East, including the U.S. partnership
with Israel, is increasing risks to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Arab nations.
In part because of that, Saudi diplomats have been trying to hold talks with Iran. The two
countries normalized diplomatic relations in 2023, in a deal brokered by China.
4/4
Tuesday, July 21, 2026
Monday, July 20, 2026
Sunday, July 19, 2026
Saturday, July 18, 2026
Friday, July 17, 2026
Thursday, July 16, 2026
Wednesday, July 15, 2026
Tuesday, July 14, 2026
Monday, July 13, 2026
Sunday, July 12, 2026
Saturday, July 11, 2026
Friday, July 10, 2026
Thursday, July 9, 2026
26-072.pdf - NRC Proposes Major Modernization of Environmental Review Process
26-072.pdf
CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200
EO14300 Rulemaking
NRC Proposes Major Modernization of Environmental Review Process
ROCKVILLE, Md. — The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has proposed the most
comprehensive update to its environmental review regulations in decades, narrowing
environmental reviews to impacts within the agency’s statutory authority and expanding
opportunities to streamline licensing for new nuclear projects while maintaining environmental
protections. The proposal also expands the use of categorical exclusions for certain actions,
including some new reactor projects, where the NRC has determined they normally do not result
in significant environmental impacts.
Wednesday, July 8, 2026
Tuesday, July 7, 2026
Monday, July 6, 2026
Saturday, July 4, 2026
Friday, July 3, 2026
Thursday, July 2, 2026
26-071.pdf - https://www.nrc.gov/sites/default/files/cdn/doc-collection-news/2026/26-071.pdf
26-071.pdf
No: 26-071 July 1, 2026
CONTACT: Office of Public Affairs, 301-415-8200
EO14300 Rulemaking
NRC Proposes Most Comprehensive Modernization of Reactor Licensing in Decades
ROCKVILLE, Md. — The Nuclear Regulatory Commission today proposed a sweeping
package of regulatory reforms aimed at modernizing reactor licensing, safety oversight, and siting
practices for nuclear power plants. The proposed rule would update requirements across virtually
every stage of a plant’s lifecycle—from initial design approvals and construction through operation,
license renewal, and decommissioning—by introducing more flexible, risk-informed, and
performance-based approaches tailored to both today’s technologies and the next generation of
reactors.
Wednesday, July 1, 2026
Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Monday, June 29, 2026
Sunday, June 28, 2026
Saturday, June 27, 2026
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)