Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire

Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

For Once, A Small Victory for Nukes


For Once, A Small Victory for Nukes

NRC infighting goes nuclear

NRC infighting goes nuclear

Don't count out nuclear just yet

Don't count out nuclear just yet

Ga. regulators approve nuclear plant spending

Ga. regulators approve nuclear plant spending

Status of nuclear power 2010

Status of nuclear power 2010
Copenhagen, Denmark (SPX) Aug 17, 2011 - Riso DTU has made its eighth report in the series: 'Nuclear power and Nuclear Safety', which gives a global overview of nuclear energy with a focus on safety and preparedness. This year's report is a bit delayed because of the accident in Fukushima, which is also mentioned in the report that would normally cover only the year 2010. The Radiation Research Division at Riso DTU was suddenly  ... more

IAEA Nuclear Power Reactors in the World 2011 Edition

Scientific & Technical Publications
Nuclear Power Reactors in the World 2011 Edition Reference Data Series 2 Subject Classification: 0700-Nuclear power IAEA-RDS-2/31 (ISBN:978-92-0-117810-7) 82 pp.; 6 figures; 12.00 Euro;
Language: English
Date Published: 2011
Responsible Officer/Officers: Mr Jiri Mandula, NENP
DESCRIPTION This is the thirty-first edition of Reference Data Series No.2, which presents the most recent reactor data available to the IAEA. It contains summarized information as of the end of 2010 on: power reactors operating, under construction, and shut down; and performance data on reactors operating in the IAEA Member States, as reported to the IAEA. The information is collected through designated national correspondents in the Member States and the data area used to maintain the IAEA's Power Reactor Information System (PRIS).
Download PDF version of this book: (01.14 MB):
Rights and Permissions
How to order this book

BNC TCASE 14: Assessment of electricity generation costs Barry Brook | 17 August 2011 at 8:32 PM | Categories: Emissions, Nuclear, Policy, Renewables, TCASE | URL: http://wp.me/piCIJ-1hu

TCASE 14: Assessment of electricity generation costs

In the previous TCASE post, I considered how various low-carbon energy technologies meet the following criteria: commercial readiness, scalability, dispatchability, fuel constraints, load access, storage requirements, capacity factor and emissions intensity. Here I consider the next issue: cost of deployment, based on expert consensus.

Emission intensity for fit-for-service baseload electricity generating technologies. Error bars represent 90% confidence intervals for the mean (bar height).
The primary data again come from the work I had published in 2011 in the peer-reviewed journal Energy (with colleagues Martin Nicholson [lead author] and Tom Biegler). Cost was analysed on the basis of 15 comprehensive levelised cost of electricity studies published over the past decade. The data are as follows (see also figure above), with references given in the footnote:

(LCOE = levelised cost of electricity (in 2009 US$/MWh) -- see footnotes for a more detailed explanation.)
Enthusiastic supporters of various renewable energy technologies have long made claims that all or most of the world's electricity needs could be met with renewable energy. Our analysis point to the costs involved and hence to the reliance on future major advances on that front in order to be competitive with other, low-emission, alternatives. In our view such reliance is highly speculative and risky as part of any plan to secure future energy.
Read more of this post
Enhanced by Zemanta

GE wants to add solar-thermal technology to its natural-gas plants to go to 70% efficiency

GE wants to add solar-thermal technology to its natural-gas plants to go to 70% efficiency

Earth: Ground Zero For The Permafrost Bomb

Earth: Ground Zero For The Permafrost Bomb

NRC Completes Major Licensing Milestone for Vogtle

NRC Completes Major Licensing Milestone for Vogtle

How We Know We Are Causing Global Heating

How We Know We Are Causing Global Heating

Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Power in Japan

Earthquake, Tsunami, and Nuclear Power in Japan

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Fairewinds Report for Southern Alliance for Clean Energy on TVA Bellefonte Plant by Fairewinds Associates plus

Fairewinds Report for Southern Alliance for Clean Energy on TVA Bellefonte Plant

Fukushima: Officials withold radiation data says Dr Leuren Moret

Fukushima: Officials withold radiation data says Dr Leuren Moret

Nuclear Power, The Economic Dirty Bomb

Nuclear Power, The Economic Dirty Bomb

Nuclear contamination threatens seawaters

Nuclear contamination threatens seawaters

A safer world; Japan ponders its nuclear future


A safer world: Japan ponders its nuclear future
National Catholic Reporter
With the ceremony coming nearly five months to the day since a March 11 tsunami caused a nuclear meltdown at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi power plant, speakers and attendees couldn't help but raise new questions about how Japan's nuclear past will relate ...

The Japanese Government and Nuclear Power, A Meltdown of Trust


 
The Japanese Government and Nuclear Power. A Meltdown of Trust
Big Think
The Fukushima nuclear disaster has offered the world a lot of important lessons. We can only hope that one of the most important…a lesson that's staring us all in the face…will be taken to heart by the culture of government officials, and business ...

Vendors submit financial proposals to Jordan from World Nuclear News by Warwick Pipe The three reactor suppliers shortlisted in May 2010 to construct Jordan’s first nuclear power plant have now submitted their financial proposals for the project to the Jordan Atomic Energy Commission. The deadline for the financial bids was 14 August. Earlier, the companies - an Areva-Mistubishi Heavy Industries consortium, Russia's AtomStroyExport and Canada's SNC-Lavalin International - submitted their technical proposals for building the plant. The designs under consideration are the Atmea-1 pressurized water reactor (PWR), the AES-92 model VVER-1000, and the Enhanced Candu-6 pressurized heavy-water reactor (PHWR). A special committee formed by the cabinet will study both the technical and financial bids and select the technology to be used in December, official state news agency Petra reported.

Vendors submit financial proposals to Jordan

The three reactor suppliers shortlisted in May 2010 to construct Jordan’s first nuclear power plant have now submitted their financial proposals for the project to the Jordan Atomic Energy Commission. The deadline for the financial bids was 14 August. Earlier, the companies - an Areva-Mistubishi Heavy Industries consortium, Russia's AtomStroyExport and Canada's SNC-Lavalin International - submitted their technical proposals for building the plant. The designs under consideration are the Atmea-1 pressurized water reactor (PWR), the AES-92 model VVER-1000, and the Enhanced Candu-6 pressurized heavy-water reactor (PHWR). A special committee formed by the cabinet will study both the technical and financial bids and select the technology to be used in December, official state news agency Petra reported.

Economics hinder US new build

Economics hinder US new build

The near-term prospects for an expansion in the use of nuclear energy in the USA "will be miserably hard and extremely challenged by economics," according to the head of Exelon, the country's largest nuclear utility.