FAS In-Depth: May 3, 2012
In three weeks, 28 NATO
member countries will gather in Chicago to approve the conclusions of a
year-long Deterrence and Defense Posture Review (DDPR). Among other
issues, the review will determine the number and role of the U.S.
non-strategic nuclear weapons deployed in Europe and how NATO might work
to reduce its nuclear posture as well as Russia's inventory of such
weapons in the future.
A new FAS Special Report- Non-Strategic Nuclear Weapons
- concludes that Russia and the United States combined possess an
estimated 2,800 nuclear warheads for their non-strategic nuclear forces.
Several thousand other non-strategic warheads have been retired and are
awaiting dismantlement. Non-strategic nuclear weapons were designed to
fight nuclear battles during the Cold War, yet both NATO and Russia
continue to attribute importance to such weapons and modernize the
remaining forces.
Written by Mr. Hans
Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project, the report
finds that unilateral reductions have been the most effective means to
reduce the number and role of non-strategic nuclear weapons and that
additional unilateral reductions remain an important way to reduce the
remaining forces. But since Russia, the United States and NATO cloak
their non-strategic nuclear forces in a veil of outdated and
unnecessary secrecy, new initiatives are needed to increase transparency
of such forces.
Your support helps the
Federation of American Scientists make a difference. As a valued FAS
Member, you're able to read the report before it is released to the
general public.
To read the report, click here (PDF).
For more information on non-strategic nuclear weapons, check out these FAS resources and more on our website.
FAS Blogs and Projects:
Strategic Security Blog
Nuclear Information Project
Defense Department Nuclear Doctrine and Policy
U.S. Nuclear Policy
Congressional Research Service Reports:
Nonstrategic Nuclear Weapons
U.S. Strategic Nuclear Forces: Background, Developments, and Issues
U.S. Nuclear Weapons: Changes in Policy and Force Structure
Nuclear Arms Control: The Strategic Offensive Reductions Treaty
Nuclear Weapons in Russia: Safety, Security, and Control Issues
Nuclear Weapons and U.S. National Security: A need for New Weapons Programs?
Other Resources:
Nuclear Posture Review Report April 2010 (U.S. Department of Defense)
The Future of Russia’s Strategic Nuclear Forces Discussions and Arguments (Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology)
Nuclear Deterrence Skills (U.S. Department of Defense)
Nuclear Posture Review Hearing (U.S. Senate Committee on Armed Services)
No comments:
Post a Comment