NRC Chairman Jaczko speaks during the international conference.
In
the nuclear business the axiom is that an accident anywhere is an
accident everywhere. In the time that has passed since the Fukushima
Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant was overwhelmed by an earthquake and
tsunami the nuclear community has seen again that nuclear communication
is global as well.
Last
week, 170 national nuclear regulators, national nuclear communications
executives, reporters from around the world, representatives of
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and others gathered in Madrid to
discuss nuclear crisis communication – how to accomplish it in an era of
instant communication and how to ensure that regulators attain and
retain trust among the publics to whom they communicate.
The
first-of-a-kind session was organized by the Paris-based Nuclear Energy
Agency (NEA) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (a post World War II reconstruction agency), and sponsored
by the Spanish nuclear regulator, Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear. What
gave weight to the meeting was the heavy presence of top national
regulatory leaders. They came from the United States, France, England,
Switzerland, India, Japan, Spain, Korea, Hungary, Russia, Austria,
China, NEA, OECD and the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency.
It
was preceded and followed by meetings of a group of nuclear
communicators from a variety of governments constituting the Working
Group on Public Communication under the umbrella of the NEA’s Committee
on Nuclear Regulatory Activities. And the starting point for discussions
was the WGPC’s
Roadmap for Crisis Communications .
For
the United State’s part, NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko moderated a panel
on lessons learned from past crises. Panelists included the regulatory
chiefs from India and Ireland, a senior member of China’s regulator, and
a top communications executive from the Spanish CSN.
Summing
up the session, Jaczko said that timeliness of communication is an
element in effective crisis communication, that how an agency
communicates can affect trust and credibility, and that it is important
to quickly communicate what information is available, even if it is
incomplete, because as more details become available communications can
be made more precise.
As
the NRC’s Director of Public Affairs, I made a presentation on the use
of social media in crisis communications, making the point that in an
era of tweets, governments must adapt to the new social media tools to
keep the public informed. I described how useful the NRC’s blog was
during the Fukushima plant accident and catalogued the use of social
media among other nations.
This
was the start of a long-overdue dialogue on global nuclear
communications in general and crisis communications in particular, and
kudos to the NEA for organizing the sessions and the CSN for hosting in
Madrid, one of the world’s beautiful cities.
Next
stop – Vienna, Austria, in June when the IAEA convenes an International
Experts Meeting where the United States will have the opportunity to
brief the IAEA member nations on the NRC’s approach to communicating
with the public.
Communication is now clearly both instant and global, and a regulator’s comments anywhere can reach everywhere.
Eliot Brenner
Director, Office of Public Affairs
No comments:
Post a Comment