Kent Hawkins Offers Reasonable Doubt About Wind's Carbon Mitigation Effectiveness (updated repost)
Nuclear Green Revolution had its' origin in a debate which I had with
GRIST'S David Roberts. Roberts argued that investments in nuclear power
would be a mistake. When confronted with the need for post carbon power
sources, Roberts claimed that renewables could provide all the power we
need at a lower cost than nuclear power. I did not have a source that
provided a strong contradiction, so I set out setting up a preliminary
source from scratch. My source looked at what renewables cost and what
we got for our money and what else it would take a renewable post carbon
system to work. My conclusion was that renewables would be more
expensive and far less reliable than nuclear power and the ability of
renewables to mitigate CO2 discharges for energy was at best
questionable.
http://nucleargreen.blogspot.com/2013/07/kent-hawkins-offers-reasonable-doubt.html
No comments:
Post a Comment