| Supreme Court: EPA Must Consider Costs In Power Plant Rule |
|
By
Lorene Boudreau, Brendan K. Collins, Robert McKinstry, Jr., Ronald
Varnum | Ballard Spahr LLP, Tuesday, June 30, 2015 4:00 PM
|
The
U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Michigan v. EPA, reversing a
ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
and holding that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) must
consider costs of compliance before deciding whether to regulate
hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) emitted from power plants.http://breakingenergy.com/2015/06/30/supreme-court-epa-must-consider-costs-in-power-plant-rule/?utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=20092000&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9uytTm4_IsXfUJykRxW7sEgy-kLnEzxqNyD27f3IR3-A4E3bzj9BpUKRJIqnsEeVlQ2XLdZgN3ghJ_i3mZHRCwXaphpQ&_hsmi=20092000
|
Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire - Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry. Nuclear Activities
Wednesday, July 1, 2015
Supreme Court: EPA Must Consider Costs In Power Plant Rule
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment