Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire

Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry.
Showing posts with label Arms control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Arms control. Show all posts

Saturday, November 6, 2010

Future For “New START” Murky After Election -- Global Security Newswire



WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration appears to face an even more daunting challenge in convincing the Senate to ratify a U.S.-Russian nuclear arms control treaty in the wake of this week's election results. How GOP gains in the chamber will impact the pact's chances, though, might not be known for weeks or months (see GSN, Nov. 4).

Proponents of "New START" urged the Senate to quickly bring the treaty to a vote, while skeptics argued for caution and more deliberation.

Read more ....

More News On Calls To Ratify The New Start Treaty

With Republicans gaining Senate seats, arms control advocates worried about nuclear weapons treaty -- CTNow
White House Pushes START Ratification Before New Congress Arrives -- Radio Free Europe
Obama urges Congress to vote on new START treaty by year end -- Xinhuanet
Obama hopes START treaty will pass Congress soon -- AFP
Obama: Hopes Russia arms pact ratified this year -- Reuters
Midterms 2010: Hillary Clinton wants 'lame-duck’ Congress to pass Start treaty -- The Telegraph
Kerry urges START ratification by end of year -- Politico
Russia Fears ‘Reset’ of Relations With U.S. -- Wall Street Journal
Abroad, Fear That Midterm Result May Turn U.S. Inward -- New York Times
National Review: Off To A Lame START -- NPR
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Obama Administration Pursues Landslide "New START" Vote

http://gsn.nti.org/gsn/nw_20101006_5463.php
The Obama administration believes senators could vote by a significant margin in favor of ratifying a new U.S.-Russian nuclear arms control treaty, Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller said yesterday (see GSN, Oct. 5).
U.S. B-52H strategic bomber jet engines, shown in 2007 at Barksdale Air Force Base, La. The Obama administration hopes U.S. senators will vote overwhelmingly to ratify a new nuclear arms control treaty with Russia, the pact's top U.S. negotiator said yesterday (Paul Richards/Getty Images).
President Obama and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev in April signed "New START," which requires their nations to each cut their deployed strategic nuclear weapons to 1,550 warheads, down from the maximum of 2,200 allowed by 2012 under an earlier agreement. They must both also restrict their active nuclear delivery vehicles to 700, with another 100 platforms allowed in reserve.
The pact is awaiting a ratification vote in the Senate, where the 67 votes required for passage must include at least eight Republicans in this Congress.
The treaty's prospects for approval are "good" during the congressional session following November's midterm elections, the Associated Press quoted Gottemoeller as saying.
"We are hoping that we will have the same kind of vote which was the vote for the [1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty], 95-0 against," said Gottemoeller, the top U.S. negotiator of the new agreement. "We're looking for that kind of vote this time around as well."
Addressing whether the treaty could be ratified in 2010, she said, "Absolutely, yes." Obama wants to have the pact "ratified and on its way to entering into force by the end of this year," Gottemoeller said.
Speaking yesterday to the U.N. General Assembly's Disarmament and International Security Committee, Gottemoeller called for movement on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and the resumption of negotiations aimed at producing a fissile material cutoff treaty (see GSN, Sept. 27; Edith Lederer, Associated Press/Washington Post, Oct. 5).
The international Conference on Disarmament in Geveva, Switzerland, in 2009 broke a deadlock that had lasted for more than 10 years, agreeing to a work plan that would address four issues: nuclear disarmament, a fissile material cutoff pact, the prohibition of space-based weapons, and an agreement by nuclear-armed states not to use their strategic weapons against nations that do not possess such armaments. Pakistan initially endorsed the plan, but later withdrew its consent and demanded further consideration of the program. Decisions at the conference are made by consensus.
"I have to tell you that I expressed some disappointment at the fact that the Conference on Disarmament over the last years has been less energetic in terms of pursuing its overall agenda," Agence France-Presse quoted Gottemoeller as saying after U.N. talks failed to break the impasse.
"We will do everything so that we can have talks go forward -- there is no reason to stand still," she added.
"We will definitely continue to press" for a fissile material pact, she said. "We regard this delay as unwarranted and out of step with the expectations of the wide majority of states seated here today" (Agence France-Presse/Google News, Oct. 5).
In a cautionary note targeting Pakistan, Gottemoeller said governments would consider other possible means for advancing disarmament negotiations if the deadlock in Geneva persisted, AP reported.
The United States and other nations would together consider other possible avenues for advancing arms control dialogue, she said without elaborating (Lederer, Associated Press).
Meanwhile, Russia yesterday pressed all nuclear-armed nations to join future arms reduction negotiations with Moscow and Washington, Interfax reported.
"The reduction in the gap in the size of the arsenals of our countries, and other [recognized nuclear-weapon states], is insistently raising the issue of the gradual accession of other countries having nuclear arsenals to the Russian-American disarmament efforts," Russian Foreign Ministry official Anatoly Antonov, the top Russian negotiator of "New START," told the General Assembly panel.
The five recognized nuclear powers are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Continued nuclear disarmament "will be simply impossible at a certain stage" without the participation of countries that possess such weapons outside the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Antonov said. Those known or suspected nuclear-armed states are India, Israel, North Korea and Pakistan (see related GSN story, today).
Arsenal reductions mandated by "New START" would make "further deep cuts impossible without due account for all other processes taking place in the sphere of international security," Antonov said.
Other potential obstacles to nuclear disarmament include "the formation of regional missile defense systems without due account for the security of neighboring countries, the prospect of the appearance of arms in space, the plans of developing strategic carriers with conventional warheads, the unilateral buildup of the potential of strategic missile defense, the growing imbalance in the sphere of conventional armaments [and] the deployment of nuclear weapons in the territories of non-nuclear states," he said (see GSN, Sept. 22; Interfax, Oct. 5).
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

US-Russia ties at stake with START vote: diplomat

Washington (AFP) Sept 14, 2010 - US-Russia relations could suffer if senators fail to ratify a new arms control treaty, with Moscow possibly refusing to back Washington's policy on Iran, a top US official said Tuesday. Forging a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) has bolstered cooperation between the former Cold War foes on national security issues, paving the way for Moscow to support new UN sanctions against Iran ... more
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

DEFENSE: NUCLEAR PROGRAM HAS AIR FORCE BOTH WORRIED AND HOPEFUL By Otto Kreisher

The commander of the U.S. Strategic Command expressed concern Monday over
several aspects of nuclear deterrent capabilities but praised the Nuclear
Posture Review and the administration's FY11 budget that requested a
substantial funding increase to upgrade nuclear weapons facilities and
modernize and sustain the weapons stockpile.

Air Force Gen. Kevin Chilton also gave a strong endorsement of the New
START arms control treaty, calling it a "strategy-based approach" to which
his command contributed.

Earlier in the day at the Air Force Association's conference at the
National Harbor convention center in Maryland, a number of senior Air Force
officers in nuclear deterrent commands noted the improvements made in the
last two years to re-establish high standards of security and performance
and to start improvements in the aged nuclear weapons arsenal.

In addressing the challenges to nuclear deterrence, Chilton warned that
the critical capability to warn of a possible nuclear attack is eroding
because of the continued failure of the Space Based Infrared missile launch
warning system.

He noted that he protested the lack of the SBIRS network of satellites in
2008 and 2009 and was assured both times that launch of the first
satellites was imminent. But the program remains trapped in technical
problems and threatened by massive cost overruns.

"It is past time to eliminate this critical gap in our strategic missile
warning system," he said.

Chilton also protested the badly deteriorated condition of the nuclear
weapons production facilities at Oak Ridge, Tenn., which he noted, were
built during the Manhattan Project in the 1940s.

But he praised the steps taken by the administration "to reverse the
15-year neglect" of the nuclear infrastructure, including refurbishment and
upgrades to the nuclear warheads.

Chilton expressed concern that there was no plan to replace the Minuteman
III intercontinental ballistic missiles, but noted that the Navy has
started work on replacing the Ohio-class strategic missile submarines. He
suggested it also should begin planning a replacement for the D-5 Trident
missiles the subs carry.

He also worried about the future of the solid rocket industrial base that
would be needed to produce replacements for the Minuteman and the D-5.

On the positive side, Chilton cited the NPR, which confirmed the need for
a strong nuclear deterrent force and continuation of the nuclear Triad of
land- and sea-based missiles and bombers, and the New START treaty.

Asked about his previous comments that even if Russia cheated on the
treaty's limits it would not be a problem, Chilton said the verification
system would prevent a militarily significant violation. And even if the
Russians violated the pact, they could not gain enough of an edge to
consider a nuclear attack.

Ratification of the treaty in the Senate has been delayed by Republican
concern about the arms reduction and verification.

Earlier, officials noted that the Air Force has spent $8.5 billion in
rebuilding its nuclear deterrent capabilities and created the new Global
Strike Command to establish a single authority over both the missile and
bombers.


http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/nsa_20100914_7883.php

Enhanced by Zemanta