-
Uranium Substitute Is No Longer Needed, but Its Disposal May Pose Security Risk
The Department of Energy is faced with the challenge of the proper disposal of uranium-233, a man-made substitute for natural uranium that is classified as waste and can be used to create a weapon. The material was seen as a suitable fuel for reactors, but ordinary uranium cost less and proved to be much easier to work with. "There's no further need for" uranium-233, said David Huizenga, senior administrator for environmental management at the department. The New York Times (tiered subscription model)http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/us/uranium-233-disposal-proves-a-problem.html?_r=0
Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire
Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Uranium Substitute Is No Longer Needed, but Its Disposal May Pose Security Risk
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment