Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire

Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry.
Showing posts with label Harry Reid. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harry Reid. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Arizona regulator asks for end to nuclear waste fees

End to nuclear-waste fee is sought by Arizona official
Arizona Corporation Commissioner Bob Stump urged Energy Secretary Steven Chu to end a fee that would help pay for the development of a permanent nuclear-waste repository. The fee now serves no purpose because the government terminated the Yucca Mountain project, Stump added. "Why are Arizonans and our nation's ratepayers, who are working to recover from one of the harshest recessions in American history, being forced to continue to pay this fee, with no benefit in sight," he wrote in a letter to Chu. The Arizona Republic (Phoenix)
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

US Senate to open START debate




http://www.spacewar.com/reports/US_Senate_to_open_START_debate_999.html Washington (AFP) Dec 14, 2010 President Barack Obama's Democratic allies in the US Senate said Tuesday they would kick off formal debate on a landmark nuclear arms control pact with Russia and predicted its ratification this year. Obama has made the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) a lynchpin of his drive to "reset" relations with Moscow, and called for passage this year in what would be a signal diplomatic victory two months after an elections rout.
Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told reporters he could bring up START late in the day or on Wednesday despite stiff objections from Republicans who say there is not enough time for a full debate.
Asked whether the accord would net the 67 votes needed for ratification and whether he would bring the agreement to a vote this year, as Obama has requested, Reid replied: "Yes. The answer is yes on both."
Obama's Democratic allies currently control 58 Senate seats, and need nine of the 42 Republicans to reach the 67 votes needed for approval -- but that number rises to 14 when a new Congress arrives in January.
The agreement -- which has the support of virtually every present and former US foreign policy or national security heavyweight -- restricts each nation to a maximum of 1,550 deployed warheads, a cut of about 30 percent from a limit set in 2002, and 800 launchers and bombers.
The agreement, which has broad American public support, would also return US inspectors who have been unable to monitor Russia's arsenal since the agreement's predecessor lapsed in December 2009.
"I believe we can pass the START treaty if we get a chance to (vote), the key is to get it going," Democratic Senator John Kerry, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman and the accord's lead champion, told reporters.
"It's on the agenda, we want to get it done but the key is sort of when we wrap up what," Kerry said, citing ongoing battles over tax cuts, government spending bills, and other matters with the 2010 legislative clock ticking.
Just three Republicans have publicly said they will back the treaty, but others have broadly signalled that they will support the accord as long as Democrats allow suitable time for debate.
The Republican point-man on the treaty, Senator Jon Kyl, has publicly said that he has not yet made up his mind, but his office has bombarded journalists with news articles critical of the accord and opinion pieces urging its defeat.
While Republicans were highly unlikely to muster the 51 votes needed to amend the treaty -- effectively killing it by forcing new talks with Moscow -- a source said they planned a series of politically difficult amendment votes.
Two Republican sources said they would try to strike language in the accord's non-binding preamble that declares there is a relationship between offensive nuclear weapons and missile defenses.
Republicans have charged that the accord may handcuff US missile defense plans fiercely opposed by Russia, though the Pentagon and arms experts of both parties have flatly denied any such impact.
And the White House has responded to worries from Kyl and others about funding the upkeep of the US nuclear arsenal by budgeting some 84.1 billion dollars over ten years for modernization and maintence.
The Russian lower house of parliament, the State Duma, has indicated it will ratify the treaty only after its ratification by the US Senate.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, December 6, 2010

Obama tells governors he won't reconsider Yucca shutdown Obama says he won't revive storage site

Map showing the location of Yucca Mountain in ...Image via Wikipedia
WASHINGTON -- Nevada Gov.-elect Brian Sandoval on Friday wrapped up three days of meetings with federal leaders, with the most notable episode of the week taking place during an audience with President Barack Obama.
While Obama was taking questions Thursday during a meeting with 23 new governors in the official White House guest house, incoming South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley challenged him on Yucca Mountain.




Haley, whose state is suing to revive the terminated project, asked whether Obama would reconsider his decision to shut down the proposed Nevada nuclear waste site.
"You might want to ask the Nevada governor about that," Obama quipped. At which point Sandoval jumped in. "I think I can answer that question for you, Mr. President," he piped up.
Like other elected Nevadans, Sandoval opposes the Yucca project. Obama turned to Haley and defended his decision before the new governors, saying his administration was looking for alternatives to the Nevada storage site.
"It was a fast exchange," Sandoval said afterward, but one that was welcomed by Nevada's new chief executive.
"It reaffirmed to me the president will not be supporting the long-term storage of nuclear waste in Nevada," Sandoval said. "I have the understanding the administration has not changed its position."
Beyond his comment on Yucca Mountain, Sandoval did not ask Obama questions. But he said it was clear that Nevada's concerns about the cost of Obama's signature health care reform was shared by others in the session that was held at Blair House.
Again, it was Haley who challenged Obama to repeal the health care legislation. He rejected the idea, but reportedly offered the possibility the states could opt out of some requirements under certain conditions.
During three days in Washington, Sandoval met with various Cabinet secretaries, Republican leaders in Congress and members of Nevada's delegation.
The newly elected Republican said the sessions were good first steps to establish relationships with federal leaders. He said Obama promised governors his administration would reciprocate.
"He said we can be very confident they will return our calls," Sandoval said.
In a meeting last month with Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., Sandoval asked the Senate majority leader about chances the government could pick up $215 million of Nevada's costs to run Medicaid, the free health care program for the poor.
Nevada has been hit hard by the recession and major cuts are expected in Sandoval's budget, which he will present to the Legislature in 2011. The state will be hit with a 17 percent drop in tax revenues over the next two years, according to this week's projection by the state Economic Forum.
Sandoval also expressed concern to Reid about Nevada owing the government $105 million in interest charges over the next two years on loans that have enabled the state to pay unemployment benefits.
Sandoval said Friday that he did not get into detail on those issues in meetings this week, including one with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. But he said he is scheduling a follow-up with her chief of staff that will get into the numbers.
"They said there may be ways that they can assist Nevada," Sandoval said. "We haven't gotten into the specifics but that was the objective of my trip, to meet with the respective Cabinet secretaries and talk about Nevada issues and to be able to follow up from there."
Sandoval also planned a follow-up meeting Friday with the chief of staff to Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood after meeting with the Cabinet member on Thursday. The topic was to be high-speed rail, one of the issues Obama discussed with new governors on Thursday.
Sandoval said he wanted the government's view of competing proposals to serve the Las Vegas-Southern California corridor with magnetic levitation trains or conventional high-speed rail before deciding which plan his administration will support.
"What I want to do .... is sit down and see what there is to offer," Sandoval said. "I want to try to understand what the respective position of the Department of Transportation is in regard to the two projects.
"I think it's important we have high-speed rail in the state of Nevada but I am not going to pick one project over the other," Sandoval said. "It's a fact finding mission .... in seeing exactly where the Department of Transportation is. I did not realize how big a priority it is for the administration, and there are a lot of resources available to the states that will be participating."
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, November 19, 2010

End the NRC stalling on Yucca Mountain decision

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/editorials/2013469370_edit19yucca.html

Recent revelations lend credence to allegations the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been stalling on announcing its Yucca Mountain decision for political purposes. Time for the NRC to announce its decision on whether the Obama administration can cancel the project unilaterally.
IT'S confirmed. Four Nuclear Regulatory Commission members cast their votes months ago on the question of whether the Obama administration can unilaterally cancel the nation's deep geological nuclear-waste repository. But the votes have been kept secret apparently for political reasons.
Attribute the holdup to NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko, who seems to have done everything he can to game the process and keep the question about Yucca Mountain from a more credible proceeding in federal court.
Congress designated the site 100 miles from Las Vegas as the destination for the nation's commercial nuclear waste and high-level defense waste, such as that now at Hanford in Southeastern Washington.
The NRC's own licensing board in June ruled that, no indeed, the Obama administration cannot flout the will of Congress. The question before the NRC is whether to affirm or overturn that ruling — a decision needed before the Washington, D.C., Circuit Court of Appeals will take up related litigation.
Washington state, South Carolina and others have sued.
The bizarre political maneuverings at the NRC have given the agency long renowned for its straight-shooting credibility a black eye. Though the vote remains secret, Jaczko has ordered repository scientists to stop a near-complete study. The agency's inspector general says he's looking into the matter at the behest of a former commissioner.
Four of the commissioners — a fifth recused himself — voted by Sept. 15, as they each confirmed in recent letters to Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla. Jaczko, who voted Aug. 26, said he withdrew his vote and revoted Oct. 29 — just days before his patron, former boss and fervent opponent of Yucca Mountain, Sen. Harry Reid, barely fended off a tough Nov. 2 challenge.
Speculation is rampant the NRC vote did not go Jaczko's way. We can't help but think that if it had, the public would have been notified by a breathless news release around Sept. 15. Heck, Reid could have touted it in his campaign brochures.
Enough stalling, Chairman Jaczko. Time to publish this opinion so this very serious national matter can be settled in a more credible venue.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, November 18, 2010

More pressure on NRC's phase-out of Yucca review Posted by Steve Tetreault

Republicans are keeping the pressure on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, whose chairman directed staff last month to begin phasing out their review of the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste site.

Three U.S. House members on Tuesday asked the acting director of the White House budget office to clarify what authority NRC chairman Gregory Jaczko had "to shut down the Yucca review and terminate the project."

"While it is widely known the Obama administration opposes Yucca Mountain, it remains our nation's repository for spent nuclear fuel and high level defense waste under the law,"  according to the letter signed by Reps. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, and Paul Ryan, R-Wisc.

Jaczko has said he was acting under budget guidance approved by the NRC. The House members asked Jeffrey Zients, acting director of the Office of Management and Budget for a detailed explanation of the NRC chairman's budget authority.

The proposed Yucca Mountain project in Nevada has provided rare drama at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a normally low profile agency with the job of regulating the use of nuclear power and the handling of radioactive materials.

As the Obama administration has shut down the program, it also has asked the NRC to withdraw a two-year old construction license application for it. The NRC board is split, however, as to whether the project can be stopped without explicit direction from Congress.http://www.lvrj.com/blogs/politics/More_pressure_on_NRCs_phase-out_of_Yucca_review.html?ref=204
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, November 15, 2010

GOP, Reid headed for more conflict over Yucca, nuclear waste

WASHINGTON -- A new Republican majority in the House is poised to assert itself on nuclear waste matters in the upcoming Congress, with newly re-elected Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada set to guard again that the Yucca Mountain repository plan is not revived.
President Barack Obama with strong direction from Reid, the Senate majority leader, shut down the Nevada program once envisioned for burying 77,000 tons of highly radioactive used nuclear fuel and waste materials into the Nye County ridge, 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas.
A blue ribbon commission that Obama established to study alternatives is expected to release a draft report next summer, with a final version due early in 2012. But there still is a twitch in the Yucca corpse. Two years ago the Department of Energy under President George W. Bush sought permission from government nuclear safety regulators to build out the Nevada site. Despite the change in White House leadership and policy, that application remains alive for now, if only on paper.
A variety of state leaders, congressional officials, energy consultants, environmental advocates and industry lobbyists said the ultimate fate of the Yucca program might be decided in the courts.
But in the meantime, they said, a stage is being set for low-grade conflict over the two years of the next congressional session, with a possible window for change opening when the blue ribbon commission issues its recommendations.
By the 2012 elections, the Nevada repository plan could be doornail-dead and long gone if a new nuclear waste management strategy emerges and gains consensus, or it could be poised for an attempted resurrection if one does not.

http://www.lvrj.com/news/gop--reid-headed-for-more-conflict-over-yucca--nuclear-waste-107602518.html?ref=518
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Nuclear Industry Ponders Next Step for Waste

Industry awaits new approach for nuclear wastehttp://enr.ecnext.com/coms2/article_powo101103NuclearIndus
 

Industry observers are looking at how the Obama administration plans to handle permanent nuclear-waste storage after it decided to abandon the Yucca Mountain project in Nevada. The Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future, set up by the administration, is heading discussions on future nuclear-waste policy. "It's certainly [going to be] a starting point for whatever happens," said Rod McCullum, director of the Nuclear Energy Institute's used-fuel program. Engineering News-Record
 
Enhanced by Zemanta

US NRC ending Yucca review 'grossly premature,' commissioner says

Svinicki: NRC order to stop Yucca review was "grossly premature"
It was "grossly premature" for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to halt the licensing review of the Yucca Mountain nuclear-waste repository, Commissioner Kristine Svinicki wrote in a letter to Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas. Svinicki said she disagrees with Chairman Gregory Jaczko's Oct. 27 letter to Barton, in which Jaczko said the order was in line with agency policy. Platts http://www.platts.com/RSSFeedDetailedNews/RSSFeed/ElectricPower/6564760
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, October 25, 2010

Yucca's future rides on senate race

Yucca Mountain's fate could be decided in midterm election
Should Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., lose his re-election bid next month, Nevada's congressional opposition to the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository would be significantly weakened, according to Bruce Breslow, executive director of the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects. "Our entire Nevada delegation has opposed Yucca, but we had no clout until Senator Reid became majority leader," said Breslow. "Without a majority leader from Nevada, other states would have built an expressway to Yucca Mountain." Reno Gazette-Journal (Nev.)/Gannett News Service
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

NRC Chairman is bending rules in Yucca Mountain proceeding

Attempts to kill Yucca Mountain have become "downright brazen"
The tactics used by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to force a shutdown of the Yucca Mountain nuclear-waste-repository project "have gone beyond suspicious to downright brazen," according to The Seattle Times. Chairman Gregory Jaczko's directive to stop a project evaluation contradicts a ruling of the NRC's own licensing board, ignores ongoing litigation in federal court and makes light of the opinion of more than 90 members of Congress, the newspaper adds. The Seattle Times
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, October 8, 2010

States protest 'end run,' urge Nuclear Regulatory Commission to restart Yucca Mountain work Washington, South Carolina want Nevada site as possibility

WASHINGTON -- Officials from states that are storing millions of gallons of nuclear waste urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on Thursday to put its scientists back to work evaluating Yucca Mountain as a potential disposal site.
Attorneys for Washington state and South Carolina filed a formal motion with the agency alleging that Chairman Gregory Jaczko acted improperly in directing the staff to "begin an orderly closure of high level waste activities."
The states were joined by Aiken County, S.C., where the federal government stores 36 million gallons of highly radioactive waste at its Savannah River complex. In Washington state, more than 53 million gallons of radioactive and chemical waste are at the Hanford site.
The parties argue that the NRC commissioners have yet to rule on an Obama administration request to close out the license application for Yucca Mountain. And until they do, the evaluation cannot be ended, they argued.
The NRC confirmed receipt of the motion. Spokesman David McIntyre said the agency, as its usual practice, would not comment.
Neither Jaczko nor any of the four other commissioners has commented on the guidance, which staff said came in the context of a budget memo for the new fiscal year that began Oct. 1.
Amid the silence, unconfirmed rumors swirled of palace intrigue at the top levels of the agency that otherwise has a reputation as a by-the-book body whose focus is on regulating the safety and security of nuclear power plants and the handling of nuclear materials.
Agency spokesmen moved Thursday to dispel whispers among attorneys and lobbyists of some significant and impending development in the commission's handling of Yucca Mountain, perhaps an announcement in some form of a vote.
McIntyre said the commission has no meetings scheduled on the topic, and two of its five members are out of town this week.
The Yucca issue is seen as politically sensitive among policymakers as it touches on Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., the Senate majority leader who is up for re-election.
Reid contends the nuclear waste burial in Nevada is unsafe and unsound, and has made its termination a part of his career and his campaign. Through the Obama administration, he has engineered the shutdown of project offices and all but buried decades of government drive to locate a nuclear waste site 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas.
Before he joined the NRC in 2005, Jazcko was a top aide to Reid handling appropriations and nuclear matters. An NRC ruling that allows the Yucca Mountain construction application to be withdrawn "with prejudice," meaning it could not be refiled, could amount to a final nail in the coffin.
Nevada leaders who have opposed the program say they are hopeful of a final ruling to kill the program for good, although some unconfirmed reports suggest the commission is split and could come down either way.
Rep. Dina Titus, D-Nev., said Thursday Jaczko's decision to halt the staff review in the meantime was "a sound decision."
"I will continue to work with my colleagues to ensure that this misguided project never sees the light of day," Titus said.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Yucca project review halted NRC chief tables viability study of nuclear waste site By STEVE TETREAULT

NRC's Jaczko Orders End to Review of Yucca Mountain Application
NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko has issued an order for agency scientists to cease reviewing DOE's application for the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported today. NRC said the order followed a previously established commission policy "that directs a transition to begin an orderly closure of high level waste activities" at Yucca.

NRC spokesman David McIntyre said commissioners planned no comments on the instructions. The Nuclear Energy Institute contended that the NRC was obligated to review DOE's petition to withdraw its application for Yucca before commissioners voted on the petition. The group noted the "general principle, that as long as an application is pending, which it is, the agency is under an obligation."

Nevada politicians applauded Jaczko's order, with Meredith MacKenzie, spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid quoted as saying: "Why would anybody want the federal government to continue wasting time and valuable resources working on a license application for a project that has no money, no staff, and no chance of ever being built?"
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, September 20, 2010

Haley Slams Reid's Rejection of Yucca Nuclear Waste Site

S.C. candidate criticizes Reid's campaign against Yucca Mountain
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is squandering billions of dollars in trying to terminate the Yucca Mountain nuclear-waste project, said Nikki Haley, a gubernatorial candidate in South Carolina. About $20 billion has been invested in the repository, including $1.2 billion from South Carolina, Haley said. "President Obama and Harry Reid are willing to shut down Yucca and make South Carolina a permanent dumping ground to save Harry Reid's Senate seat," she added. FoxNews.com (9/19) http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/19/haley-goes-nuclear-yucca-waste-site-shutdown/
Enhanced by Zemanta