Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire
Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry.
Showing posts with label United States Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States Congress. Show all posts
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Nuclear Energy Suffers Another Big Blow -- Will the Dying Industry Continue to Beg for More Government Subsidies?
Nuclear Energy Suffers Another Big Blow -- Will the Dying Industry Continue to Beg for More Government Subsidies?
from AlterNet.org by Harvey Wasserman, AlterNet
2010 again left the "nuclear renaissance" in the Dark Age that defines the technology. But an Armageddon-style battle looms when Congress returns next year.
Related articles
- Can the tea party go nuclear? (politico.com)
- Completing Nuclear Energy's Digital Transformation (environmentalleader.com)
- Report urges more gov't support for nuclear energy (sfgate.com)
- Report urges more gov't support for nuclear energy (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Carnival of Nuclear Energy 31 (nextbigfuture.com)
- Carnival of nuclear energy 32 (nextbigfuture.com)
- Carnival of Nuclear Energy 24 (nextbigfuture.com)
- The cost of renewable energy (tfa.net)
- Solar Energy to Focus on Nuclear Energy (eon.businesswire.com)
- One Stock Added to WNA Nuclear Energy Index in Quarterly Rebalancing (prweb.com)
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Chu Urges Congress to Look to Nuclear Power Energy secretary says Congress should consider nuclear power in clean energy mandate
The Obama administration's energy chief asked Congress on Tuesday to consider nuclear power and other nonrenewable sources in a mandate for utilities to use more clean energy, which could attract Republicans who have opposed focusing exclusively on renewable energy like wind.
Efforts to pass the "renewable electricity standard" requirement have stalled in Congress, in part because of regional resistance. Opponents in the Southeast, for example, argue that their region lacks renewable sources such as abundant levels of wind.
Energy Secretary Steven Chu said his call was an acknowledgment of those differences.
"There's all sorts of other forms of clean energy," Chu told reporters. "Some states would favor something in terms of clean energy like nuclear." More at:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=12331684&tqkw=&tqshow=
Efforts to pass the "renewable electricity standard" requirement have stalled in Congress, in part because of regional resistance. Opponents in the Southeast, for example, argue that their region lacks renewable sources such as abundant levels of wind.
Energy Secretary Steven Chu said his call was an acknowledgment of those differences.
"There's all sorts of other forms of clean energy," Chu told reporters. "Some states would favor something in terms of clean energy like nuclear." More at:
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=12331684&tqkw=&tqshow=
Related articles
- Chu Urges Congress to Look to Nuclear Power - ABC News (news.google.com)
- Steven Chu: Clean Energy Standard Could Include Nuclear, Clean Coal (huffingtonpost.com)
- We're Gonna Need a Deeper Cave: (brothersjuddblog.com)
- Politico: Energy Secretary Steven Chu intends to stay (climateprogress.org)
- Nuclear 'Renaissance' Is Short on Largess (green.blogs.nytimes.com)
- Report urges more gov't support for nuclear energy (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Chu: Congress should consider nuclear in mandate (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
Thursday, November 11, 2010
UAE Missile Deal Worth 140 Million Announced from Military Space News, Nuclear Weapons, Missile Defense
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/UAE_Missile_Deal_Worth_140_Million_Announced_999.htmlWashington DC (SPX) Nov 11, 2010
The Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress November 3 of a possible Foreign Military Sale to the Government of the United Arab Emirates of 100 Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and 60 Low Cost Reduced-Range Practice Rockets (LCRRPR), as well as associated equipment, training and logistical support for a total package worth approximately $140 million.
Monday, October 25, 2010
Why Bringing Down The Electric Grid Is Hard
Burlington VT (SPX) Oct 26, 2010 - Last March, the U.S. Congress heard testimony about a scientific study in the journal Safety Science. A military analyst worried that the paper presented a model of how an attack on a small, unimportant part of the U.S. power grid might, like dominoes, bring the whole grid down. Members of Congress were, of course, concerned. Then, a similar paper came out in the journal Nature the next mo ... more
http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/Why_Bringing_Down_The_Electric_Grid_Is_Hard_999.html
http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/Why_Bringing_Down_The_Electric_Grid_Is_Hard_999.html
Related articles
- The US electrical grid is too crappy to be vulnerable to terrorist attack, say physicists [Crime] (io9.com)
- Study: It's Hard to Bring Down the Electric Grid (usnews.com)
- Why it's hard to crash the electric grid (eurekalert.org)
- Grid Security, Distribution Automation, and Demand Response to Take a More Prominent Role in Smart Grid Deployments in 2011, According to Pike Research (eon.businesswire.com)
- Don't Worry About Terrorist's Attacking Electrical Grid - The Grid's Too Unreliable To Fail (dvorak.org)
- Cyberwar Hype Leaps To The UK, While Electric Grid Expert Calls Claims Of Attacks 'Hooey' (techdirt.com)
- Smart Grid Creating High-Tech Jobs in Colorado (prweb.com)
- Johnny Fever, the Webification of the Power Grid, & Energy Entrepreneurism (paul.kedrosky.com)
- Marketing the Smart Grid (blogs.hbr.org)
Wednesday, October 20, 2010
NRC Chairman is bending rules in Yucca Mountain proceeding
Attempts to kill Yucca Mountain have become "downright brazen"
The tactics used by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to force a shutdown of the Yucca Mountain nuclear-waste-repository project "have gone beyond suspicious to downright brazen," according to The Seattle Times. Chairman Gregory Jaczko's directive to stop a project evaluation contradicts a ruling of the NRC's own licensing board, ignores ongoing litigation in federal court and makes light of the opinion of more than 90 members of Congress, the newspaper adds. The Seattle Times
The tactics used by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to force a shutdown of the Yucca Mountain nuclear-waste-repository project "have gone beyond suspicious to downright brazen," according to The Seattle Times. Chairman Gregory Jaczko's directive to stop a project evaluation contradicts a ruling of the NRC's own licensing board, ignores ongoing litigation in federal court and makes light of the opinion of more than 90 members of Congress, the newspaper adds. The Seattle Times
Related articles
- NRC Chairman is bending rules in Yucca Mountain proceeding (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
- Republicans Charge 'Impropriety' in Halting Yucca Mountain Safety Review (news.sciencemag.org)
- Haley Goes Ballistic Over Reid's Rejection of Yucca Nuclear Waste Site (foxnews.com)
Friday, September 24, 2010
Another Feeble-Headed Nuke Drops Dead by Harvey Wasserman
As the "reactor renaissance" desperately demands new billions from a lame duck Congress, one of its shining stars has dropped dead. Other much-hyped "new generation" plans may soon die with it. http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/09/24-0
Related articles by Zemanta
- Harvey Wasserman: Another Feeble-Headed Nuke Drops Dead (huffingtonpost.com)
- Harvey Wasserman: Is the "Nuclear Renaissance" Dead Yet? (huffingtonpost.com)
- DHS Wasting $500M on Nuke Precautions? (foxnews.com)
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Panel Seeks Pentagon WMD Response Reforms
The U.S. Defense Department should revise numerous elements of its preparations for responding to attacks involving weapons of mass destruction, a congressionally established experts panel warned in a report issued yesterday (see GSN, Sept. 10).
The report outlines more than 40 steps Congress and the Obama administration could take to improve the country's WMD response capabilities. The panel, comprised for former high-level U.S. military officials, former lawmakers, National Guard officers and academic experts on disaster response, received support from RAND Corp. in completing the study.“This is a matter of critical importance because such an incident will happen, and the stakes are too high to delay action,” panel Chairman Steve Abbot said in a statement. “In our year of deliberations, we identified a number of findings and recommendations that will allow the Department of Defense to better support the civil authorities that will respond to a domestic disaster" (RAND Corp. release, Sept. 15).
The department wields many of the powers it would need to aid civilian agencies after a biological, chemical, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive strike, but the powers "are not widely known and are frequently misunderstood," says the document, prepared by the Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Capabilities for Support of Civil Authorities After Certain Incidents.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Panel Suggests Changes in Long-Term Defense Planning | Defense ... (defencetalk.com)
- FACTBOX-Pentagon changes aim to boost productivity (reuters.com)
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
China’s Factories Look to Revamp Business Models By DAVID BARBOZA.
As costs rise, factories are revamping, helping build a middle class and encouraging sustainable growth.
Related articles by Zemanta
- China Shifts From Emphasis on Low-Cost Factories (nytimes.com)
Arms deal will anger Iran, cheer Israel
Beirut, Lebanon (UPI) Sep 14, 2010 - The massive U.S. arms deal with Saudi Arabia, reportedly worth $60 billion and counting, will undoubtedly calm Riyadh's fears of Iran by considerably expanding the offensive capabilities of the kingdom's air force. But it will antagonize the Islamic Republic at a time of high tension with the United States and is sure to lead to a significant boost in the supply of even more advanced U. ... more
Related articles by Zemanta
- Israel's silence over Saudi arms deal speaks volumes (theglobeandmail.com)
- $60b deal steps up arms race in Gulf (nowpublic.com)
- It's a big deal (economist.com)
- US-Saudi arms deal (theworld.org)
- US prepares to approve $60bn arms deal with Saudi Arabia (guardian.co.uk)
- Israel reportedly OKs U.S.-Saudi arms deal (jta.org)
- Congress to be told of 60-billion US-Saudi arms deal (alternet.org)
Friday, September 3, 2010
EPA to issue more rules in climate fight
(Reuters) - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will roll out more regulations on greenhouse gases and other pollution to help fight climate change, but they will not be as strong as action by Congress, a senior administration official said.
The agency "has a huge role to play in continuing the work to move from where we are now to lower carbon emissions", said the official, who did not want to be identified as the EPA policies are still being formed.
The agency "has a huge role to play in continuing the work to move from where we are now to lower carbon emissions", said the official, who did not want to be identified as the EPA policies are still being formed.
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Saudis Amass U.S. Weapons To Confront Iran -- Space War
Saudis Amass U.S. Weapons To Confront Iran -- Space War
A proposed $60 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia, one of the largest-ever U.S. weapons sales, marks the consolidation of America as the kingdom's main arms supplier after years of strain following 9/11.
The deal, which includes Boeing F-15SA Strike Eagle fighters, also underlines Riyadh's determination to confront the threat it perceives from Iran, Saudi Arabia's rival for regional supremacy and leadership of the Muslim world.
The Pentagon advised the U.S. Congress of the proposed multi-layered deal, which is expected to win approval in September.
Read more ....
Related articles by Zemanta
- The US - Israel - Saudi Arabia axis? (israelmatzav.blogspot.com)
- US arms 'bonanza' in Middle East :: Israel and Saudis to buy advanced war planes (windowintopalestine.blogspot.com)
Monday, July 26, 2010
Four Ways to Kill a Climate Bill By LEE WASSERMAN
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/26/opinion/26wasserman.html
Opinion: 4 main factors led to demise of climate bill
The failure of the White House and Congress to deliver a broad climate bill this year can be traced to four major mistakes, writes Lee Wasserman, director of the Rockefeller Family Fund. The bill failed to progress because it downplayed the impact of global warming, contained too many concessions to special-interest groups, was overly complicated and did not receive adequate input from the public, Wasserman writes
Opinion: 4 main factors led to demise of climate bill
The failure of the White House and Congress to deliver a broad climate bill this year can be traced to four major mistakes, writes Lee Wasserman, director of the Rockefeller Family Fund. The bill failed to progress because it downplayed the impact of global warming, contained too many concessions to special-interest groups, was overly complicated and did not receive adequate input from the public, Wasserman writes
Related articles by Zemanta
- Climate Bill, R.I.P. (rollingstone.com)
- NYT editorial: Obama must lead on climate legislation (dailykos.com)
- As Climate Bill Falters, Steve Schneider Might Have Counseled Optimism (news.sciencemag.org)
- Oh That Tom Friedman -- By: Jonah Goldberg (corner.nationalreview.com)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)