Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire

Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

US: too early for military action after North Korea assault

US: too early for military action after North Korea assault

N.Korean attack related to succession: analystLondon (AFP) Nov 23, 2010 - North Korea's artillery attack on South Korea is likely linked to the eventual power transfer from leader Kim Jong-Il to his youngest son, a leading analyst said Tuesday. Mark Fitzpatrick, a fellow of the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) in London and formerly a senior official at the US State Department, said however that it was unlikely to lead to full-scale conflict. "It's hard not to draw the conclusion that this, like the Cheonan sinking, was related to the succession," Fitzpatrick told AFP, referring to a South Korean warship in March that Seoul said was hit by a North Korean torpedo.

Both incidents were ways to give North Korean heir apparent Kim Jong-Un "some accomplishments," he said. "He has had little time to do anything at age 27, but given a general's title the North would like to gird him with some military victories and this is one that will surely be ascribed to his military leadership," he added. North Korea was, however, also trying to force South Korea back into talks on the disputed Yellow Sea border, said Fitzpatrick, the senior fellow for non-proliferation at IISS and ex-former US deputy assistant secretary of state. "One reason North Korea took this provocative step is to get the South's attention, to say: 'Look, unless you're willing to negotiate on this line of demarcation, you're going to draw military consequences,'" he said.

World powers condemned Tuesday's attack on Yeonpyeong island near the Yellow Sea border, which killed two marines, but nuclear-armed North Korea accused South Korea of firing first. Fitzpatrick said the clash was a "serious escalation" in tensions, especially after North Korea's disclosure at the weekend of an apparently operational uranium enrichment plant. But he added: "I don't think it will turn into a full-scale war, South Korea will be very careful not to escalate its response." Seoul would, though, seek diplomatic responses -- even though they may have no lasting effect on changing Pyongyang's thinking. They would include "responding diplomatically through the United Nations, working with the United States to get China to tighten up implementation of previous Security Council measures," he said.
by Staff Writers Washington (AFP) Nov 23, 2010 The United States said Tuesday it was too early to consider a military response to North Korea's attack on a South Korean island, while President Barack Obama was "outraged" by the deadly assault. Obama was awakened before dawn with news of one of the worst border crises in 60 years and the White House immediately demanded Pyongyang respect an Armistice agreement that ended the 1950-53 Korean war.
The US leader, who visited Seoul this month, was expected to speak to South Korea's President Lee Myung-Bak shortly.
US envoy on North Korea Stephen Bosworth, who was in Beijing, meanwhile said the United States and key regional player China agreed on the need for restraint, after he discussed the Yellow Sea incident with Chinese officials.
The Pentagon was closely monitoring the latest flashpoint with the nuclear-armed Stalinist state, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates spoke by phone with South Korean Defense Minister Kim Tae-Young, officials said.
"At this point it's premature to say that we're considering any action," spokesman Colonel Dave Lapan told reporters.
He said no additional US forces had been deployed to the region as a result of the North Korean artillery barrage.
"We're still monitoring the situation and talking with our allies," Lapan said, adding that Washington was "mindful" of which actions might exacerbate or cool tensions on the peninsula.
Obama, woken by his national security advisor Tom Donilon at 3:55 am (0855 GMT) as the crisis broke, left as planned on a trip with Vice President Joe Biden to a Chrysler auto plant in the state of Indiana.
White House deputy spokesman Bill Burton told reporters on Air Force One that though Obama would speak with Lee, there were currently no plans for him to make an on-camera statement.
"The president is outraged by this action. We stand shoulder to shoulder with South Korea," Burton said.
In an early morning statement, White House press spokesman Robert Gibbs said Washington was in close and continuing contact with its ally South Korea after the attack on Yeonpyeong island, which killed two South Korean marines.
"The United States strongly condemns this attack and calls on North Korea to halt its belligerent action and to fully abide by the terms of the Armistice Agreement," Gibbs said.
"The United States strongly condemns this attack and calls on North Korea to halt its belligerent action and to fully abide by the terms of the Armistice Agreement."
Officials appeared to be taking care not to adopt any actions that could further inflame the situation, or reward Pyongyang's latest provocation, following a long showdown over its nuclear program.
Mindful of difficulties in dealing with North Korea's volatile leadership amid an apparent political succession, Pentagon press secretary Geoff Morrell told MSNBC the Pyongyang regime was "extremely unpredictable."
"They do things you could not possibly have predicted in a rational world," Morrell said.
Bosworth meanwhile said the shelling came up "in my conversation with the Chinese and we both share the view that such conflict is very undesirable and expressed firmly the desire that restraint be exercised."
China is seen as the only state which has any influence on Pyongyang, and Washington has in the past exerted behind-the-scenes pressure on Beijing to press North Korea to avoid inflammatory actions.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Seoul rules out redeployment of US nuclear weapons




http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Seoul_rules_out_redeployment_of_US_nuclear_weapons_999.html Seoul (AFP) Nov 23, 2010 South Korea's defence ministry Tuesday ruled out the redeployment of US nuclear weapons on its soil as a deterrent to North Korea, a day after its minister had raised the prospect. "Redeploying US tactical nuclear weapons in South Korea would cross the line set by the policy of denuclearising the Korean peninsula," Deputy Defence Minister Chang Kwang-Il told reporters.
"We've not considered redeploying US tactical nuclear weapons and there has been no consultation with the US over the issue," he was quoted as saying by a ministry spokesman.
The Pentagon also said Monday that the United States has no immediate plans to redeploy the weapons, which were withdrawn in 1991.
Revelations over the weekend about a new uranium enrichment plant in North Korea triggered alarm in Washington, Tokyo and Seoul.
Asked in parliament Monday whether the South would consider asking for a redeployment, Defence Minister Kim Tae-Young told a lawmaker that the government "will review what you said".
His comment made front-page headlines in most newspapers Tuesday.
Chang said that the minister's comment had been taken out of context and meant that the South could consult with the US on "all possible options".
The United States still stations 28,500 troops in the South, but pulled out the atomic weapons as part of a disarmament initiative.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Russia agrees to build two more reactors in China

http://www.nuclearpowerdaily.com/reports/Russia_agrees_to_build_two_more_reactors_in_China_999.html


Strelna (AFP) Nov 23, 2010 Russia on Tuesday signed a contract to build two additional reactors in China's Tianwan nuclear power plant as Chinese premier Wen Jiabao is in Russia for several days of energy talks. Russia's first 1,000-megawatt nuclear reactor at Tianwan in eastern China went into operation in June 2007 after numerous delays, while a second went into operation in September of the same year.
Russia has been competing with Western nations and Japan for a slice of China's nuclear power market as Beijing plans an increase in the number of its nuclear power stations to reduce its dependence on coal.
Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who together with Wen oversaw the signing of the contract by Russia's Atomstroyexport nuclear reactor builder, has tasked officials with boosting Russia's share of the global nuclear market to 25 percent from the current 16 percent.
Wen and Putin are also expected to tackle pricing disputes in gas cooperation and attend a 13-nation summit that aims to save the tiger and double the big cat's population by 2022.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

China, Russia Sign Energy Accords, No Gas Price Breakthrough

Nov. 23 (Bloomberg) -- China and Russia agreed to expand oil, coal and nuclear power cooperation as economic growth in the Asian country drives energy demand while talks continued on gas pricing to start exports.
The neighboring countries are unlikely to reach a price agreement before mid-2011, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin said today in St. Petersburg where Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao met his counterpart Vladimir Putin.
Russia’s nuclear power plant builder, ZAO Atomstroyexport, signed a contract to construct a third and fourth nuclear reactor at China’s Tianwan complex, at a ceremony presided over by Wen and Putin. Wen is scheduled to meet with President Dmitry Medvedev in Moscow tomorrow, the Kremlin said on its website. More at:
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-11-23/china-russia-sign-energy-accords-no-gas-price-breakthrough.html
Enhanced by Zemanta

Energy Industry Strikes Out on Its Own

A group of utility executives who once lobbied Congress to cap greenhouse-gas emissions say they are now pressing ahead with their own efforts to clean up the industry.
"We're making our own destiny," said Chris Gould, vice president of corporate strategy for Exelon Corp. in Chicago, the nation's largest owner of nuclear-power plants and one of the biggest backers of the failed "cap and trade" legislation.
Bloomberg News
Water vapor is emitted from cooling towers at Exelon Corp.'s Limerick nuclear power generating station in Limerick, Pa.
The new, take-charge attitude is motivated not only by environmental concerns. The industry has identified what it believes are opportunities to make lucrative investments in such things as transmission lines, advanced meters, enhancements to existing power plants, and electric vehicle infrastructure.
In a blueprint released last week, Exelon executives said their 13-state region could achieve reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions nearly equal to what federal legislation might have achieved in the next decade by pressing ahead with activities already encouraged by state and federal regulators.
Exelon plans to spend more than $5 billion by 2017 in ways that should cut its greenhouse-gas emissions. It includes as much as $290 million a year on energy-efficiency programs at utilities it owns in Illinois and Pennsylvania and $3.8 billion to increase the capacity of its existing nuclear plants by up to 1,500 megawatts.
More at:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703559504575631010457589470.html
Enhanced by Zemanta

U.S. Falling Behind China and Russia in Nuclear Power Plant Renaissance, on Electric TV, an "Industry Today" Webcast on Industrialinfo.com

SUGAR LAND, TX, Nov 23, 2010 (MARKETWIRE via COMTEX) -- Researched by Industrial Info Resources (Sugar Land, Texas) -- After a 30-year hiatus, several utilities are planning to build nuclear capacity in the U.S. During the hiatus, the U.S. and Canada have fallen behind countries like China and Russia in building new nuclear reactors. With the Federal government's recently granted loan guarantee for more than $8 billion for new nuclear reactors in America, the industry is heating up. Owners of the Vogtle and the South Texas Nuclear projects are the first to ink contracts to build new nuclear reactors in America. For example, the Southern Company /quotes/comstock/13*!so/quotes/nls/so (SO 37.96, +0.00, +0.00%) (Atlanta, Georgia) is building a two-unit expansion at the Vogtle Plant using the NRC-certified Westinghouse AP-1000 reactor.
Should we be building new nuclear reactors in the U.S.? The resounding answer is "yes." In a recent interview on Electric TV, Dr. Patrick Moore, a founder of Greenpeace, debates the pros and cons of developing and constructing new nuclear reactors in North America. Dr. Moore says, "Nuclear plants are the most beneficial form of electricity technology from an economic point of view. They employ more people -- about 2,400 during construction, followed by 400-700 full time jobs after the plant becomes operational. They are expensive to build, but inexpensive to operate, comparable to coal."
Electric TV is produced by the NECA-IBEW partnership. The National Electrical Contractors Association, or NECA, was founded in 1901 and seeks to serve the management interests of electrical contractors in the United States. NECA boasts 119 chapters in all 50 states, four regional offices and a home office in Bethesda, Maryland. NECA maintains its leadership role in the electrical industry through labor relations, training, education, advocacy and research.
The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, or IBEW, was founded in 1891 as a means for electrical workers to come together with one voice. Since that time, the IBEW has grown to more than 750,000 members throughout the U.S. and Canada. Through its training, on-the-job skill and professionalism, the IBEW represents the best electricians in the world. The IBEW seeks to organize all electrical workers in the United States into local unions.
Industrial Info Resources (IIR) is the leading provider of global market intelligence specializing in the industrial process, heavy manufacturing and energy markets. IIR's quality-assurance philosophy, the Living Forward Reporting Principle(TM), provides up-to-the-minute intelligence on what's happening now, while constantly keeping track of future opportunities. For more information send inquiries to powergroup@industrialinfo.com or visit us online at www.industrialinfo.com.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-falling-behind-china-and-russia-in-nuclear-power-plant-renaissance-on-electric-tv-an-industry-today-webcast-on-industrialinfocom-2010-11-23?reflink=MW_news_stmp
Enhanced by Zemanta

Iran Says Crude Price At $100 Not To Hurt World Economy





-
http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/Iran_Says_Crude_Price_At_100_Not_To_Hurt_World_Economy_999.html Tehran, Iran (XNA) Nov 23, 2010 Iranian OPEC Governor Mohammad Ali Khatibi said that an oil price of up to 100 U.S. dollars would not hurt global economy, local satellite Press TV reported on Monday. Khatibi said on Sunday that the world economy is in a position to absorb an oil price of 100 U.S. dollars, and many experts believe that an increase in the price of oil up to 100 U.S. dollars per barrel will not create problems for the market, said the report.
Khatibi added that dollar depreciation is one of the main reasons behind the recent fluctuations in crude prices.
On Friday, crude prices plunged on demand concerns, but before Friday's plunge, crude prices had risen more than 7 percent this month and hit a two-year high this week.
Light, sweet crude for December delivery dropped 2.93 U.S. dollars, or 3.3 percent, to settle at 84.88 dollars a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
In London, Brent crude fell 2.47 dollars to settle at 86.34 dollars a barrel on the ICE Futures.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Oil Will Run Dry Before Substitutes Roll Out

http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/Oil_Will_Run_Dry_Before_Substitutes_Roll_Out_999.html

Niemeier said the new study's findings are a warning that current renewable-fuel targets are not ambitious enough to prevent harm to society, economic development and natural ecosystems.
by Staff Writers Davis CA (SPX) Nov 23, 2010 At the current pace of research and development, global oil will run out 90 years before replacement technologies are ready, says a new University of California, Davis, study based on stock market expectations. The forecast was published in the journal Environmental Science and Technology. It is based on the theory that long-term investors are good predictors of whether and when new energy technologies will become commonplace.
"Our results suggest it will take a long time before renewable replacement fuels can be self-sustaining, at least from a market perspective," said study author Debbie Niemeier, a UC Davis professor of civil and environmental engineering.
Niemeier and co-author Nataliya Malyshkina, a UC Davis postdoctoral researcher, set out to create a new tool that would help policymakers set realistic targets for environmental sustainability and evaluate the progress made toward those goals.
Two key elements of the new theory are market capitalizations (based on stock share prices) and dividends of publicly owned oil companies and alternative-energy companies. Other analysts have previously used similar equations to predict events in finance, politics and sports.
"Sophisticated investors tend to put considerable effort into collecting, processing and understanding information relevant to the future cash flows paid by securities," said Malyshkina. "As a result, market forecasts of future events, representing consensus predictions of a large number of investors, tend to be relatively accurate."
Niemeier said the new study's findings are a warning that current renewable-fuel targets are not ambitious enough to prevent harm to society, economic development and natural ecosystems.
"We need stronger policy impetus to push the development of these alternative replacement technologies along," she said.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Nuclear fuel plan raises hope, concerns

Nuclear fuel plan raises hope, concerns

- McClatchy Newspapers


A proposal to ship spent nuclear fuel from out-of-state reactors to South Carolina for recycling is reigniting concerns while its supporters say it would generate high-paying jobs and electricity without contributing to global warming.
The waste would be recycled at the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site near Aiken. Environmental concerns are being raised that the plan would make South Carolina more of a dumping ground for the nation's nuclear waste.
Both sides are closely watching a federal commission that is studying what to do with the nation's waste now that the Obama administration has shelved plans for a national repository at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.


Read more: http://www.thesunnews.com/2010/11/22/1826741/nuclear-fuel-plan-raises-hope.html#ixzz168mJs5LQ

Enhanced by Zemanta

Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire: Report: Nuclear Weapon Drivers Drank On The Job -- Washington Post

Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire: Report: Nuclear Weapon Drivers Drank On The Job -- Washington Post

Report: Nuclear Weapon Drivers Drank On The Job -- Washington Post

Report: Nuclear Weapon Drivers Drank On The Job -- Washington Post

Federal agents responsible for driving nuclear weapons and other sensitive materials sometimes got drunk and were detained by police while on the job, according to a new watchdog report.

A report released Monday by the Energy Department's Office of Inspector General found 16 alcohol-related incidents between 2007 and 2009 involving personnel with the National Nuclear Security Administration's Office of Surface Transportation (OST). About 600 OST agents are responsible for safely transporting or shipping nuclear weapons and other materials across the country.

Read more ....

More News On Nuclear Drivers Drinking On The Job

US nuclear transport agents seen 'in drunken incidents' -- BBC
Agents hired to drive nuclear weapons around U.S. got drunk while on missions: report -- New York Daily News
Drivers of nuclear weapons got drunk on duty: US probe -- AFP
Probe Finds 'Alcohol Incidents' Among DOE Agents on Nuke-Transport Duty -- New York Times
Government agents driving nuclear weapons around the U.S. 'got drunk on the job' -- The Daily Mail
Enhanced by Zemanta

South Korea Considers Return Of US Tactical Weapons -- The Guardian




Defence minister hints at deploying US weapons on his country's soil for first time since 1991 after news of North Korean plant

South Korea's defence minister today raised the possibility that US nuclear weapons could be deployed in his country for the first time in nearly 20 years, after it was revealed that Pyongyang had built an advanced uranium enrichment plant.

Kim Tae-young was speaking to a parliamentary committee about the North Korea plant, when he was asked whether the government would consider the return of US tactical weapons for the first time since they were withdrawn by President George Bush Sr in 1991.

Read more ....http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/nov/22/south-korea-us-tactical-weapons-nuclear

More News On South Korea Considering A Return Of US Tactical Weapons

U.S. Tactical Nukes May Return to South Korea -- Danger Room
S. Korea Could Seek Deployment of US Tactical Nuclear Weapons -- Voice of America
S. Korea might consider reintroducing U.S. tactical nuclear arms -- Xinhuanet
No decision on tactical nuclear weapons in S.Korea:US -- AFP
South Korea Might Seek Return of U.S. Nukes -- Global Security Newswire
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, November 22, 2010

A Return Trip to North Korea’s Yongbyon Nuclear Complex Siegfried S. Hecker Center for International Security and Cooperation, Stanford University

http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/23035/Yongbyonreport.pdf

Construction of nuclear power plant begins in Gujarat

MUMBAI: Construction of a state-of-the-art indigenously designed nuclear power plant unit began on Monday in Gujarat, an official said here.

The first pour of concrete, signifying the zero date (the official start of construction) was achieved at the Kakrapar 3 and 4 atomic power plant, near Surat.

Both the reactors have been designed by the Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd (NPCIL).

They will be India's first pair of indigenously designed 700 megawatt (MW) pressurized heavy water reactors (PHWR), the official said. The same technology has been used since 2005 in the company's 540 MW Tarapur plant, near Mumbai.

Preparations for the Gujarat project started in January this year, after which excavation work was carried out in a record time of four months.

NPCIL has launched four such reactors - two each at Kakrapar, Gujarat and Rawatbhata, Rajasthan in January and August this year. Commercial operations are expected to commence by 2015 and 2016, respectively.

Presently, NPCIL operates 19 nuclear power reactors, with a total installed capacity of 4560 MW.

These four reactors would help NPCIL generate up to 9580 MW of electricity by 2016, the official added. 

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/energy/power/Construction-of-nuclear-power-plant-begins-in-Gujarat/articleshow/6969648.cms

Dealing with a nuclear North Korea By Doug Bandow


North Korea is a nuclear power. The U.S. should get used to it. Washington’s drive to prevent the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea from acquiring nuclear weapons is dead.

Yet the Obama administration is pushing to restart nuclear negotiations with Pyongyang. Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell recently opined: “We need to see a very clear signal that this new leadership ― or some structure in North Korea ― accepts the very clear commitments that North Korea made in 2005 to denuclearization.”

There’s little reason to believe those commitments were ever sincere. Nuclear weapons offer the Kim regime obvious advantages internationally.

The domestic reasons are no less compelling. How better to run a “military first” policy than to give the armed services the ultimate weapon?

Whether Kim was ever willing to trade away his nuclear program may never be known. Maybe he’s still prepared to yield up future production. But he has given no indication that he is willing to turn over his existing arsenal.

Indeed, the regime appears to have restarted construction activity at the Yongbyon nuclear site, where in 2008 it demolished an old reactor’s cooling tower. Moreover, Christopher Hill, the Bush administration’s chief negotiator with the North, warned: “They have continued to work on their systems for delivering nuclear weapons.”

Pyongyang’s recent policy toward the South has been unreservedly hostile. Last March the DPRK sank a South Korean frigate, the Cheonan, killing 46 sailors.

Unfortunately, the situation is only likely to worsen as “Dear Leader” Kim Jong-il attempts to pass power on to his youngest son, Kim Jong-un. Despite the formal anointment at the recent meeting of the ruling Workers’ Party, the succession may not be smooth.

There are many potential claimants for power ― Kim Jong-il’s sister and brother-in-law, a slightly older son criticized as effeminate by his father and an even older son by a different wife living in disgraced but luxurious exile in Macau. Plus numerous party and military officials who have been waiting for years for their turn at the top.

Moreover, an uncertain political environment discourages serious negotiation over nonproliferation. A weakened “Dear Leader” dependent on military support is not likely to sacrifice the nuclear weapons developed at enormous expense. No one struggling for power after his demise is likely to stand against the military.

Thus, the best outcome in the next several years likely is the status quo. Negotiations may not hurt, but they are unlikely to provide any discernible benefit.

Unfortunately, none of the DPRK’s neighbors are inclined to be particularly helpful.

South Korea’s policy has ranged from isolation of the North to provision of subsidies for the impoverished communist state, while relying on the U.S. for its defense.

Seoul recently softened its position again. Japan has subordinated policy toward the DPRK to resolving the status of Japanese citizens kidnapped by Pyongyang’s agents in past years.

The ever more assertive Beijing obviously believes that stability matters more than anything else. Indeed, the Chinese have been expanding investment in the North. The result has been to discourage reform.

Nothing is likely to change in the near future. Washington should step back and leave the issue to the North’s neighbors.

The only Americans within easy reach of Pyongyang’s arms are those stationed in South Korea. Given the ROK’s manifold advantages over North Korea, an American military garrison is unnecessary. The troops should come home.

Then Washington should adopt a policy of benign neglect toward the North. Let Seoul, Tokyo, and Beijing bear the risk of implosion, war, or proliferation.

In particular, the U.S. should point out to China that North Korea remains a potential national powder keg, with a rushed power transfer amid a continuing economic crisis. Moreover, a regime willing to risk war by sinking a South Korean vessel may make a deadlier miscalculation in the future.

Moreover, Washington should indicate that it does not intend to allow a nonproliferation policy to leave only the bad guys with nuclear weapons.

Should the North continue with its nuclear program, the U.S. would reconsider its opposition to the acquisition of nuclear weapons by South Korea and Japan. Proliferation in Northeast Asia might be a nightmare, but if so, it will be one shared by Beijing.

Then the U.S. should turn its attention elsewhere.

Washington’s policy toward the DPRK has failed. North Korea is a nuclear power and is unlikely to voluntarily surrender that status.

Rather than continue a fruitless campaign to denuclearize the North, the U.S. should hand off the problem to those nations with the most at stake in a peaceful and stable North Korea. Those nations with the most at stake should take the lead in resolving Northeast Asia’s problems.

Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. A former special assistant to Ronald Reagan, he is the author and editor of several books, including “Tripwire: Korea and U.S. Foreign Policy in a Changed World” (Cato) and “The Korean Conundrum: America’s Troubled Relations with North and South Korea” (Palgrave/Macmillan, coauthor). He can be reached at ChessSet@aol.com. The views expressed in the above article are the author’s own and do not reflect the editorial policy of The Korea Times. 

http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/opinon/2010/11/137_76750.html

China National Nuclear Starts Building Hainan Reactor

Nov. 22 (Bloomberg) -- China National Nuclear Corp., the country’s biggest operator of nuclear power plants, started construction of a 650-megawatt reactor in the southern island province of Hainan.
The No. 2 reactor, one of two to be built in the first phase, will start commercial operations in 2015, China National Nuclear said in a statement on its website today. Investment in the initial phase of the Changjiang plant will exceed 20 billion yuan ($3 billion), the Beijing-based company said.
China wants at least 15 percent of its energy mix to come from non-fossil fuel by 2020 and is accelerating construction of nuclear plants to help meet that goal. The Hainan facility will join 23 other reactors being built in China, the nation with the biggest nuclear-power capacity under construction, according to the official Xinhua News Agency in May. More at:

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-11-21/china-national-nuclear-starts-building-hainan-reactor.html

Enhanced by Zemanta

Andrew Cuomo must not shut Indian Point nuclear plant, which provides safe, clean and cheap power BY Gwyneth Cravens and Dan Yurman

The Indian Point Energy Center in Westchester County produces 2,000 megawatts of electricity - about one-third of the metro area's needs. It powers Metro-North and the subway system, which transport an average weekday ridership of 5.1 million. Like the circus strongman at the base of a human pyramid, Indian Point supports the statewide grid of high-voltage transmission lines that protects against power failures. An economic engine for the state, Indian Point directly provides about 2,500 jobs. Unlike the fossil fuel plants that produce most U.S. energy, Indian Point emits no air pollution, and it keeps the lights on at a low cost.
So why does Gov.-elect Andrew Cuomo want to shut it down? He says it's unsafe, a target for terrorists and that replacement power can be found without short- or long-term consequences.
These claims are untrue. Cuomo and some of his political supporters appear to get their ideas about Indian Point from watching "The Simpsons."
This is irresponsible. More at


Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/11/22/2010-11-22_cuomo_dare_not_pull_the_plug.html#ixzz162OOPKAo
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2010/11/22/2010-11-22_cuomo_dare_not_pull_the_plug.html
Enhanced by Zemanta

Chu touts Japan's role in nuclear power industry

Japan can play an important role in providing civilian nuclear technology to energy-hungry countries, U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu said Friday, suggesting the atomic power option may aid the fight against climate change.
"We see a number of countries that are looking toward nuclear as part of their energy security," he said during a lecture at the University of Tokyo. "Japan has a major role in developing the technology."
Japan has been eager to forge nuclear cooperation agreements with developing countries to boost exports of its nuclear infrastructure, having agreed with Vietnam last month to work toward signing a bilateral agreement. Tokyo is also in talks with India on a similar pact.
"Certainly in this century, fission nuclear energy should be part of the solution," Chu also said in reference to global efforts to fight floods, rising seas and droughts by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, which are blamed for global warming.
The 1997 Nobel physics laureate noted that nuclear power can be used as a backup along with coal and natural gas until renewable energy infrastructure is built because it takes time to develop such infrastructure.
As reactors are built in more countries, there is also a risk that nuclear material could be siphoned off and get into the hands of the "not right" people, Chu said.
But Japan, a longtime civilian nuclear power with sophisticated technology, and the United States have shown "great leadership in making sure that this is really for peaceful use," he said.
Trade minister Akihiro Ohata and Chu said Thursday that a dialogue will be established for officials from the ministry and the U.S. Energy Department to discuss clean energy policies, including the promotion of peaceful and safe use of nuclear energy.
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20101120b1.html

Purdue engineer offers help to manage nuclear waste

The question of how to dispose of nuclear waste in the United States remains unanswered half a century after the first power reactor opened.

As the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository in Nevada remains controversial and slowed by legal issues, President Barrack Obama has appointed a commission to make recommendations on how to dispose and store nuclear waste from energy to defense uses.
Last week Audeen Fentiman, Purdue University professor of nuclear engineering, testified to that group -- the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future -- in Washington, D.C.
She was representing the American Nuclear Society's Special Committee on Used Nuclear Fuel Management Options and offering a summary of its upcoming final report that will be considered by the Blue Ribbon Commission.
Fentiman, who is also Purdue's associate dean of engineering, is considered an expert on nuclear waste management and has co-authored a textbook on the subject.
The American Nuclear Society's final report will be submitted in January. The Blue Ribbon Commission's final report is due by January 2012. More at:
http://www.jconline.com/article/20101121/NEWS0501/11210360/Purdue-engineer-offers-help-to-manage-nuclear-waste

More private firms want partnerships at SRS Energy park, reactors, synthetic fuels on the table

Although two private firms have announced intentions to develop and test a new line of small, modular nuclear power reactors at Savannah River Site, at least two more companies are exploring similar efforts. More at:
http://chronicle.augusta.com/news/government/2010-11-19/more-private-firms-want-partnerships-srs?v=1290206519
Enhanced by Zemanta