Nuclear Waste Storage Rules Thrown Out by U.S. Court
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission failed to fully evaluate the risks associated with regulations governing storage of spent nuclear fuel and must draft new ones, an appeals court ruled.
The commission’s conclusion that permanent storage will be available when needed in the future didn’t calculate how the lack of such a facility could affect the environment, the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington said. The commission also failed to fully assess the dangers of storing spent fuel on-site for 60 years after a nuclear plant’s license expires, the court said.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/
Full text of ruling
http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/i
Nuclear Waste Storage Rules Thrown Out by US Court BusinessWeek By Don Jeffrey on June 08, 2012 The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission failed to fully evaluate risks associated with its regulations on the storage of spent nuclear fuel and must draft new ones, an appeals court ruled. The commission's conclusion that ... |
Appeals court throws out NRC rule allowing radioactive waste to sit at plants ... Washington Post The appeals court, in a unanimous ruling Friday, said the Nuclear Regulatory Commission did not fully evaluate the risks associated with long-term storage of waste. The court said on-site storage has been “optimistically labeled” as temporary, ... |
Nuclear Agency Ordered to Revisit Waste-Storage Plan Wall Street Journal The unanimous finding from the US Court of Appeals here means the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will have to revisit a 2010 decision that said nuclear waste could safely be stored at closed nuclear-power-plant sites for at least 60 years. |
Nuclear Waste Storage Rules Thrown Out by U.S. Court Bloomberg The US Nuclear Regulatory Commission failed to fully evaluate the risks associated with regulations governing storage of spent nuclear fuel and must draft new ones, an appeals court ruled. The commission's conclusion that permanent storage will be ... |
The United States requested an extension so it could prepare its position brief. The court granted it, http://www.state.nv.us/
No comments:
Post a Comment