While the public debates the merits of renewables versus fossil fuels in power generation, Hungary is quietly preparing to build new units at the Paks nuclear power plant, making a significant – and carbon-free – contribution to the country's future energy supplies.
The state-owned Paks nuclear plant, Hungary's largest power plant with 2,000 MW generation capacity, plans to at least double its capacity by adding two new units in the 2020s. If the project clears financial, regulatory and political hurdles in the coming years, it may help Hungary achieve a sustainable and competitive energy mix.Michele Kearney's Nuclear Wire
Major Energy and Environmental News and Commentary affecting the Nuclear Industry.
Showing posts with label Power station. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Power station. Show all posts
Monday, December 6, 2010
Thursday, December 2, 2010
FuelCell Energy To Build Small Scale Direct FuelCell Power Plant
Due to their highly efficient power generation, lack of pollutants and quiet operation, fuel cell power plants are well-suited for commercial buildings located in urban environments. |
POSCO Power will fund the $5.8 million program in stages as performance milestones are reached, with an initial funding of $2.9 million for design and development of a smaller scale fuel cell stack.
Due to their highly efficient power generation, lack of pollutants and quiet operation, fuel cell power plants are well-suited for commercial buildings located in urban environments.
Fuel cells efficiently generate power using an electrochemical process that does not involve combustion. The lack of combustion results in virtually zero pollutants and quiet operation.
Fuel cell generated power can make use of available clean energy incentives, and can compete favorably with commercial and residential electricity rates in many regions of the world.
"FuelCell Energy's DFC products have been demonstrated as a dependable, ultra-clean solution," said Ben Toby, Vice President of Global Business Development for FuelCell Energy. "With this announcement, POSCO Power and FuelCell Energy seek to build on their partnership to enter into a previously untapped market segment, which has the potential to drive significant volume."
FuelCell Energy's core DFC power plant product line consists of the 300 kilowatt DFC300, the 1.4 megawatt DFC1500, and the 2.8 megawatt DFC3000. The DFC3000 is scalable for utility-size applications of multiple megawatts.
Related articles
- 70 Fuel Cell Mercedes-Benz Vehicles Will Deploy in California (solarfeeds.com)
- China Unveils Fuel Cell Light Rail Train (ecogeek.org)
- FirstEnergy Tests The World's Largest Mobile Fuel Cell System (techcrunch.com)
- Platinum-free, methane-fueled fuel cells developed (gizmag.com)
- San Diego Project Taps New England Fuel Cell Company to Generate Energy From Waste Methane Gas (xconomy.com)
- SOFC micro CHP plants to be climate-friendly power stations in homes (scienceblog.com)
- DOE Awards FuelCell Energy $2M to Continue Development of High Pressure Electrochemical Hydrogen Compressor Technology (greencarcongress.com)
- Danish company is developing green power plants for private homes (gizmag.com)
Thursday, November 18, 2010
SPECIAL REPORT RELEASE Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Electricity Generation Plants
SPECIAL REPORT RELEASE Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Electricity Generation Plants This paper provides information on the cost of building new electricity power plants. These cost estimates are critical inputs in the development of energy projections and analyses. They play an important role in determining the mix of capacity additions that will serve growing loads in the future and the response of electricity generators to the imposition of environmental controls on conventional pollutants or any limitations on greenhouse gas emissions. See the full paper at: http://www.eia.gov/oiaf/beck_ |
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
New EPA rules will erode power grid reliability, report finds
Energy reserves available to the power grid for peak use could be cut in half, says an industry report, as power plants are retired for noncompliance with stiffer clean-air and clean-water rules.
Four federal environmental regulations to improve water and air quality could by 2018 chop by nearly half the amount of projected reserve energy available to the US power grid, says a new report.Related Stories
Related articles
- EPA: Enviro regs won't affect grid (politico.com)
- New Report Shows Electric Sector Able to Manage Tighter Environmental Standards (eon.businesswire.com)
- Energy lobbyists throwing money at new best buddies in Congress (grist.org)
- 3 Reasons Why We Don't Have to Choose Between our Health and a Reliable Power Grid: Facilitating a Transition Away From Dirty Coal (switchboard.nrdc.org)
- Study Finds EPA Transport Rule Will Not Impact Electric Grid Reliability (environmentalleader.com)
- Alstom Grid Selected to Provide HVDC Converter Assets for Tres Amigas SuperStation (eon.businesswire.com)
- M.J. Bradley and Associates LLC Issues Report Saying Electric Power Industry Can Maintain System Reliability While Reducing Air Pollution Emissions (eon.businesswire.com)
- Utilities can meet EPA standards without threatening reliability (grist.org)
- Technology Companies Are Lining Up for Smart Grid Business (nytimes.com)
- Solar Shield--Protecting the North American Power Grid (spacefellowship.com)
- NYISO says that dangers loom in for power grid (timesunion.com)
- Wave-Generated Electricity Powers U.S. Grid for the First Time (gas2.org)
- NASA's Solar Shield to mitigate damage to power grid from severe solar storms (gizmag.com)
PSC continues Progress Energy nuke plant fee
The commission's decision "confirms the state's commitment to state-of-the-art nuclear power as a strategic asset," Jacobs said.
The Florida legislature passed a law in 2006 that lets utilities begin charging customers for nuclear plant costs during construction. Costs for conventional plants cannot be recovered until they are completed. More at:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/39854935
Monday, October 25, 2010
India - 'We want to buy power plants abroad'
Arup Roy Choudhury became the youngest public sector CEO when he took charge of NBCC in 2001. After turning the sick construction company into a `Mini-Ratna', he took over the reins of NTPC in August. In an exclusive interview with Sanjay Dutta , he talks about taking India's largest generation utility to the next level by acquiring power plants abroad with fuel linkages, going nuclear within three years, cutting costs and a greener power basket.
Excerpts: What is your mantra for NTPC? To become the largest and the best worldwide. We are already best in capacity utilisation. But we are not the best globally. We are Number 2, 3 in some aspect or the other. With just 700 unit per capita consumption, the country gives enough possibility for growth and be the best
.Secondly, we have to be more professional in costing and design. We must have the best of both. You'll find us competitive against private sector in the tariff-based (bidding) regime. How do you do this? Let's say what are the two basic components of competitiveness that we are looking at. One is the engineering department. We have the biggest, the oldest engineering department.
We have to look at more efficient engineering rather than re-engineering. There has been technological developments. With change in time, we have to see whether that can reduce our costs and make for more efficient designs. A team is already on the job.Two, how do we reduce cost of fuel, as a mix (of fuel), even if it is imported. We are now importing coal through STC and MMTC. But we hope to do it ourselves. That should make it more cost-effective.
There is also another thinking. Running power plants abroad with fuel linkages. Things are working in reverse today. Western economies are not doing well. We are. Why can't NTPC buy it (power plant) in Europe or Australia with good coal linkage. Ownership in mines abroad too are a possibility. Fuel is the most important issue for us. Besides, we are a thermal company today; about 80% of our capacity is thermal. We have to bring it down to 72% by 2032. We want to do solar, wind and nuclear.
Have you identified plants abroad for acquisition? It is early to talk about it. But certainly there is a vision. We are looking at all options. How is your nuclear plan progressing? We will go with NPCIL ( Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd) as of now. Two possible projects have been identified. I can only share that the possible sites are in Haryana and MP. One of these we will do quickly, maybe 2013-14. It may be 2 x 700 mw.
Is there a rethink on hydel foray after the setback in the Loharinag Pala project? There is a rethink but not in terms of not doing it anymore. Rethinking is about strategy. How do we avoid a situation where we get surprises. Loharinag Pala was a surprise. Financially it does not affect us since the government has committed to compensate the money spent in the project. But it does affect us that we had spent so much time and energy on the project and then had to scrap it. We don't want to get into such a situation again.
What about overseas projects? Sri Lanka project is waiting for approval from their side. It takes time. Bangladesh is getting ready. Sites have been identified in Chittagong and Khulna. It will most likely be Khulna. Various reports concerning the project are underway. Coal transportation has been a major bugbear for NTPC.
How do you solve it? We are mostly dependent on the railways. They have been very positive. We are also going to soon use barges to transport coal to plants like Farakka. We have finalised the plan with the inland waterways authorities. The process has begun. Read more: 'We want to buy power plants abroad' - The Times of India
Labels:
Haryana,
India,
Khulna,
National Thermal Power Corporation,
NTPC,
Power station,
Sri Lanka,
Technology
Monday, October 18, 2010
A clean air revival 20 years ago, Congress and the president took on acid rain with stunning success. Could such a thing happen today?
To understand why the acid rain program succeeded, and what the implications could be for the global warming debate, the Globe retraced a journey taken 20 years ago, when it published a series of stories about the impact of clean air legislation. That meant a return to the Ohio power plant that was considered the single largest cause of acid rain, and to a Vermont pond that had been devastated by the pollution.
Through this lens — of the power plant and the pond — the story that emerges is one of unexpected victories, unintended consequences, and crucial lessons. More at: http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2010/10/17/washing_away_of_acid_rain_offers_lesson/
Related articles
- Letters: The Lessons of Acid Rain (nytimes.com)
- John Adams: The Clean Air Act at 40: Still Vulnerable to Polluters' Falsehoods (huffingtonpost.com)
- If You and I Have to Clean Up Our Garbage, Shouldn't the Polluters Who Trash Our Air? (switchboard.nrdc.org)
- Peter Lehner: If You and I Have to Clean Up Our Garbage, Shouldn't Polluters Who Trash Our Air? (huffingtonpost.com)
- Acid Rain 30 Years On (nytimes.com)
- David Schoenbrod: The Clean Air Act Is in No Shape to Be Celebrated (huffingtonpost.com)
- Coal Plants Emitting Less SO2, NOx This Year, EPA Says (nytimes.com)
- Power Plant Emissions - Major Gaseous Emissions (brighthub.com)
- Why Don't Republicans Champion Carbon Cap-and-Trade? It Was Their Idea (thedailygreen.com)
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Are small modular nuclear reactors in the U.S's future?
U.S. economy could gain from small modular reactors
The huge capital outlay needed for the construction of conventional nuclear plants is forcing companies to explore the idea of developing small modular reactors, writes Gary M. Sandquist, a professor emeritus at the University of Utah. The advantages of small modular reactors over current designs could open a lucrative market for U.S. SMR developers and bolster the manufacturing sector, Sandquist argues. Standard-Examiner (Ogden, Utah)
The huge capital outlay needed for the construction of conventional nuclear plants is forcing companies to explore the idea of developing small modular reactors, writes Gary M. Sandquist, a professor emeritus at the University of Utah. The advantages of small modular reactors over current designs could open a lucrative market for U.S. SMR developers and bolster the manufacturing sector, Sandquist argues. Standard-Examiner (Ogden, Utah)
Related articles
- IEER/PSR: 'Small Modular Reactors' No Panacea for What Ails Nuclear Power (prnewswire.com)
- Joshua Freed: For Big Clean Energy Results, Think Small (huffingtonpost.com)
- NRC takes steps to improve SMR license review framework (nuclear.energy-business-review.com)
- Robert Alvarez: Future supply of new tritium explosive for U.S. nuclear weapons in doubt (huffingtonpost.com)
- Asian nations need to cooperate in nuclear field (topinews.com)
- Nuclear Reactor Renaissance (spectrum.ieee.org)
- Possibilities for Small Modular Nuclear Reactors? (theoildrum.com)
- Generating the Option of a Two-Stage Nuclear Renaissance (nextbigfuture.com)
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Russian-Ukrainian engineering venture planned
Russian-Ukrainian engineering venture planned
05 October 2010
Ukraine's national electricity generator Energoatom has agreed to establish a consortium to locally produce equipment for Ukrainian nuclear power plants with AtomEnergoMash (AEM) - part of the Russian state nuclear energy company Rosatom.The agreement was reached today in Moscow during a meeting of the Russian-Ukrainian working group on cooperation in nuclear engineering, Atomenergomash announced. The meeting was attended by Vladimir Kashchenko, director general of AEM, and Vladimir Pyshniy, Energoatom's vice president for maintenance and plant equipment.
During the meeting, the working group discussed a query by Ukrainian power engineering companies as to their participation in the local manufacture of equipment for the completion of units 3 and 4 of the Khmelnitsky nuclear power plant, as well as further joint projects in Ukraine.
The working group agreed to establish the new consortium, which would be responsible for establishing domestic production of nuclear power plant equipment, including for the Khmelnitsky project. The final documents for setting up the consortium are set to be signed at the next meeting of the working group, scheduled for later this month.
In June, Russia and Ukraine signed an intergovernmental agreement on the resumption of work on the two partially built reactors at Khmelnitsky. Russia is to provide financing for the amount required to design, construct and commission the two reactors, including for payments for services and goods supplied by Russia. Any components supplied from Ukraine for the project would be financed from the Ukrainian budget.
Construction of Khmelnitsky 3 began in September 1985, while that of unit 4 started in June 1986. Work on the two units stopped in 1990 when they were 75% and 28% complete, respectively.
The Ukrainian government envisages finalizing the project in 2011 and approving the design for the new units in 2011. Construction of unit 3 should be completed in 2014 and the reactor should be commissioned in 2015. Unit 4 is expected to be completed in 2015 and commissioned the following years. Russia's AtomStroyExport won a tender in 2008 to construct two AES-92 plants with V-392B reactors at Khmelnitsky, similar to the two VVERs already operating on the site.
In June 2007, Russia and Ukraine signed a protocol of intent on cooperation between their respective nuclear power companies. Under that agreement, the nuclear energy agencies of the two countries were to develop cooperation in providing scientific and technical support to the nuclear energy industry, increasing the safety and extending the service life of nuclear reactors, designing and constructing new nuclear power plants, developing nuclear fuel cycle enterprises, and seeking joint access to third-party markets. Russia and Ukraine were also to consider establishing joint ventures to mine and enrich uranium and fabricate nuclear fuel in both countries.http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/C-Russian_Ukrainian_engineering_venture_planned-0510104.html
Monday, October 4, 2010
U.S. power plants at risk of attack by computer worm like Stuxnet
Computer Worm Stuxnet Copies Could Shut Down U.S. Power Plants
The Stuxnet computer worm, whose origin is still unknown, could serve as a blueprint for malware that would sabotage infrastructure critical to running U.S. power plants and electric grids, according to experts, the Washington Post reported. Michael J. Assante, former chief security officer at NERC, was quoted as saying: "A copycat may decide to emulate it, maybe to cause a pressure valve to open or close at the wrong time. You could cause damage, and the damage could be catastrophic." Joe Weiss, an industrial control system security specialist and managing partner at Applied Control Solutions, was quoted as saying: "What this is, is essentially a cyber weapon."
Symantec analyzed the worm and guessed that its target could have been Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities. Wrote the Post: "The United States has a covert program to sabotage the systems that undergird Iran's nuclear facilities. Some experts have also suggested that other countries, including Israel, could be behind Stuxnet." Joel F. Brenner, an ex-national counterintelligence executive and former senior counsel at the National Security Agency, said he thought the U.S. probably did not create the worm. He warned against assuming it was created by any nation state.
The worm exploited four Microsoft "zero-day" vulnerabilities and targeted a specific kind of Siemens software, according to the Post. NERC issued recommendations to power companies about how they could protect their facilities, but said companies were not required to follow them
Related articles by Zemanta
Labels:
Computer worm,
Iran,
Israel,
Microsoft,
Nuclear,
Power station,
United States,
Washington Post
Friday, October 1, 2010
GE Hitachi ESBWR Design
GEH’s next evolution of advanced nuclear BWR technology is the ESBWR European Simplified Boiling Water Reactor. It utilizes a number of new features to provide better plant security; improved safety; more location options; excellent economics; and operational flexibility that ultimately increases plant availability. The ESBWR, a GEH-designed Gen III+ reactor, is currently in the U.S. Design Certification process. The Design Control Document was docketed by the NRC in 2005, and the Referred Combined Construction and Operating License (COL) application was submitted in 2007.
ESBWR is an evolutionary design … the latest in a long line of proven GEH BWR reactors. ESBWR employs passive, safety design features. It includes further design evolutions that simplify the reactor, allowing faster construction and lower costs.
Primary benefits and features of the ESBWR include:
ESBWR is an evolutionary design … the latest in a long line of proven GEH BWR reactors. ESBWR employs passive, safety design features. It includes further design evolutions that simplify the reactor, allowing faster construction and lower costs.
Primary benefits and features of the ESBWR include:
- Simplified design features - Passively removes decay heat directly to the atmosphere - 11 systems are eliminated from previous designs - 25 percent fewer pumps, valves and motors
- Passive design features reduce the number of active systems, increasing safety … … It is 11 times more likely for the largest asteroid near the earth to impact the earth over the next 100 years than for an ESBWR operational event to result in the release of fission products to the environment
- Incorporation of features used in other operationally-proven reactors, including passive containment cooling, isolation condensers, natural circulation and debris resistant fuel
- Natural Circulation in ESBWR fact sheet <!--
- Expedited construction schedule because of standardized modules and pre-licensed design –>
- GEH is ready to support utilities looking to build an ESBWR power plant, with a well-established global supply chain.http://www.linkedin.com/news?viewArticle=&articleID=212662631&gid=2133651&type=member&item=31096273&articleURL=http%3A%2F%2Fnuclearmatters.co.uk%2F2010%2F10%2Fge-hitachi-esbwr-design%2F&urlhash=0iMx&goback=.gde_2133651_member_31096273
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
A Way to Attack Nuclear Plants Industrial computer systems are typically far less secure than they should be, experts say. By Robert Lemos
For the last few months, a sophisticated computer worm has wriggled its way between some of the most critical control systems in the world.
The timing of the worm's release, combined with several clues buried in its code, has led some experts to speculate that the worm, dubbed Stuxnet, was originally designed to sabotage an Iranian nuclear facility, possible the enrichment plant in Natanz, roughly 180 miles south of Tehran. This week, officials in Iran confirmed that Stuxnet had been found on systems inside the plant, although they denied that it had caused any harm.
But Stuxnet has since spread to hundreds more industrial systems within Iran and around the world. Experts say this highlights a worrisome weak spot in critical infrastructure that could become a new focus for saboteurs and malicious hackers.
Stuxnet infects computers by using previously unseen flaws in Microsoft's Windows operating system. It has most likely spread via hand-carried USB flash drives. From an infected Windows computer, it targets a specialized type of computer known as a programmable logic controller, or PLC. These computers are widely used in critical infrastructure, including manufacturing, water processing, power generation, and transportation. PLCs connect to, and control, devices used to perform many tasks, from opening a door, to increasing the flow of fuel inside a power plant.
Stuxnet is the first example of attackers targeting the specialized computers that control industrial operations, security experts say. "It goes down into the embedded device, inserts itself, and starts doing command-and-control," says Walter Sikora, vice president of security solutions for Industrial Defender, a security consultancy that focuses on critical infrastructure. "This is an area that was unprecedented in terms of a virus or a worm or any other kind of malware."A Way to Attack Nuclear Plants Industrial computer systems are typically far less secure than they should be, experts say. By Robert Lemos
More at link
http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/26384/?nlid=3565&a=f
| Going nuclear: The Stuxnet computer worm may have designed to infiltrate an Iranian nuclear facility in Natanz, 180 miles south of Tehran. Credit: Getty Images |
But Stuxnet has since spread to hundreds more industrial systems within Iran and around the world. Experts say this highlights a worrisome weak spot in critical infrastructure that could become a new focus for saboteurs and malicious hackers.
Stuxnet infects computers by using previously unseen flaws in Microsoft's Windows operating system. It has most likely spread via hand-carried USB flash drives. From an infected Windows computer, it targets a specialized type of computer known as a programmable logic controller, or PLC. These computers are widely used in critical infrastructure, including manufacturing, water processing, power generation, and transportation. PLCs connect to, and control, devices used to perform many tasks, from opening a door, to increasing the flow of fuel inside a power plant.
Stuxnet is the first example of attackers targeting the specialized computers that control industrial operations, security experts say. "It goes down into the embedded device, inserts itself, and starts doing command-and-control," says Walter Sikora, vice president of security solutions for Industrial Defender, a security consultancy that focuses on critical infrastructure. "This is an area that was unprecedented in terms of a virus or a worm or any other kind of malware."A Way to Attack Nuclear Plants Industrial computer systems are typically far less secure than they should be, experts say. By Robert Lemos
More at link
http://www.technologyreview.com/computing/26384/?nlid=3565&a=f
Related articles by Zemanta
- Stuxnet worm can re-infect scrubbed PCs (infoworld.com)
Labels:
Computer worm,
Control system,
Getty Images,
Iran,
Malware,
Microsoft,
Power station,
Windows
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
China's latest new reactor
China's latest new reactor
| Concrete pouring cranes arc over the ceremony (Image: CGNPC) |
A ceremony last week saw the official start of work on Ningde 3, the 21st nuclear project underway in China.
The reactor joined two others at Ningde as officially under construction on 8 January, while approval for unit 4 as the last of Phase I build was signed off by officials at the same time.
Addressing 500 people at the 'first concrete' ceremony, general manager of the Ningde Nuclear Power Company Li Yinong said the power plant would avoid the use of 12 million tonnes of coal per year. He said this equates to a saving of 27 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions, compared to using the fossil fuel.
Li's firm is a project company to manage the construction and later operate the reactors. It is 51% owned by China Guangdong Nuclear Power Company with Datang International Power Generation and Fujian Coal Group taking the balance of equity.
All four Ningde units are of the CPR1000 design of pressurized water reactor, which produces 1080 MWe. Work on unit 1 started in February 2008 and has now reached the point of containment dome installation. Unit 2 began in November 2008 and was said to be at the peak of works. The construction of unit 4 is to start in mid-July this year. They will all come online between late 2012 and 2015.
With the addition of two reactors in Phase II, six reactors are eventually for the site, which spans three islands near Fuding city in Fujian province.
China's drive for localisation of nuclear technology has reached a new peak with this project, CGNPC reported. Some 80% of components for Ningde 3 will be sourced from Chinese suppliers, including for the first time the entire digital control system.
Alstom generator packages for Chinese plants
28 September 2010
Alstom has announced it is to supply equipment and services for six steam turbine-generator packages for three nuclear power plants in China under a contract worth €100 million ($135 million).China's Dongfang Electric Corporation Limited (DECL) placed the order with Alstom after itself being appointed by the China Guangdong Nuclear Power Co (CGNPC) and China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) to design, manufacture and supply steam turbine-generator packages for the Ningde Phase II, Fuqing Phase II and Tianwan Phase III nuclear power stations. The plants, which are all about to start or are in the early stages of construction, each comprise two nuclear units - Chinese-designed CPR-1000s at Ningde and Fuqing, and Russian-designed VVER-1200s at Tianwan.
The six 1000 MWe packages include the Alstom-designed Gigatop four-pole turbogenerator and Arabelle half-speed steam turbine, plus moisture separator reheaters, condensers and low pressure heaters all designed by Alstom. The components are being supplied in partnership with DECL, which has the heavy engineering capacity to produce nuclear components from reactor pressure vessels and steam generators through to turbine generators.
A similar model of turbine-generator package was supplied by Alstom for use in the first CPR-1000, Lingao Phase II unit 1 (also known as Lingao 3), which is now in commercial operation. The Chinese CPR-1000 unit is a pressurised water reactor based on earlier French-designed models built at Daya Bay. The first two units built at Ling Ao used French technology but with 30% localisation, and were redesignated CPR-1000, but Ling Ao 3 is claimed as the first CPR-1000 to be built, with a localisation rate of over 50%.
Monday, September 27, 2010
Russia to Begin Tianwan Nuclear Power Reactors Construction Next Year
Russia will begin construction of two addtional reactors at the Tianwan nuclear power plant in China next year, the head of the Rosatom state-controlled nuclear corporation said.
Russia's nuclear power equipment and service export monopoly Atomstroyexport and its Chinese partner, the Jiangsu nuclear power corporation, signed a framework agreement this March on construction of two VVER-1000 reactors with a power output of 1000MW.
"The work must begin next year," Rosatom head Sergei Kiriyenko said.
The first two VVER-1000 reactors at the Tianwan nuclear power plant were started in 2007.
Atomstroyexport and the Jiangsu nuclear power corporation signed a general contract to build the plant, the largest project in Russian-Chinese economic cooperation, in 1997. The Russian company was charged with design work, equipment and material supplies, construction and assembly work, as well as training Chinese personnel.
Russia and China agreed that Moscow would receive $1.8 billion to build the second stage of the Tianwan nuclear power plant.http://nuclearstreet.com/nuclear_power_industry_news/b/nuclear_power_news/archive/2010/09/27/Russia-to-Begin-Tianwan-Nuclear-Power-Reactors-Construction-Next-Year-092703.aspx
Russia's nuclear power equipment and service export monopoly Atomstroyexport and its Chinese partner, the Jiangsu nuclear power corporation, signed a framework agreement this March on construction of two VVER-1000 reactors with a power output of 1000MW.
"The work must begin next year," Rosatom head Sergei Kiriyenko said.
The first two VVER-1000 reactors at the Tianwan nuclear power plant were started in 2007.
Atomstroyexport and the Jiangsu nuclear power corporation signed a general contract to build the plant, the largest project in Russian-Chinese economic cooperation, in 1997. The Russian company was charged with design work, equipment and material supplies, construction and assembly work, as well as training Chinese personnel.
Russia and China agreed that Moscow would receive $1.8 billion to build the second stage of the Tianwan nuclear power plant.http://nuclearstreet.com/nuclear_power_industry_news/b/nuclear_power_news/archive/2010/09/27/Russia-to-Begin-Tianwan-Nuclear-Power-Reactors-Construction-Next-Year-092703.aspx
Related articles by Zemanta
Labels:
Energy,
Moscow,
Nuclear,
Nuclear power,
Power station,
Rosatom,
Russia,
Technology
Blog Post: TVEL Wins Contract for Nuclear Fuel Plant in the Ukraine from Nuclear Power Industry News
According to news reports, Ukraine's cabinet approved the Ministry of Fuel and Energy's proposal to construct the nuclear fuel plant at a meeting on 22 September, the country's national news agency Ukrinform reported.
TVEL was said to have won the tender as, unlike the other bidder Westinghouse, it had expressed willingness to invest its own money in the construction of the plant. The cost of constructing the fuel plant is put at some $212 million.
Vitaliy Lukianenko, the prime minister's press secretary, noted, "TVEL was unanimously supported during a competition for choosing the company to build the plant."
A condition of the tender is that Ukraine holds a controlling stake in the joint venture company that is to be established to manage the plant, despite TVEL likely to provide the majority of the funds to construct it. Another condition is the requirement for the transfer of technology for the manufacture of fuel assemblies under a non-exclusive licence by 2020 for reactors both in Ukraine and abroad.
According to Yuriy Nedashkovsky, president of national electricity generator Energoatom, nuclear fuel fabrication could start at the new plant in 2013. Initial production capacity of the plant will be 200 tonnes of uranium equivalent (tUe) per year of fuel rods and assemblies. In 2017, capacity to manufacture fuel pellets is set to increase to 400 tUe, while in 2020 the plant will be able to produce 400 tUe of fuel rods and assemblies.
Ukraine has 15 nuclear power reactors at four nuclear power plants (Khmelnitski, Rovno, South Ukraine and Zaporozhe), all operated by Energoatom. All the units are Russian VVER types, two being 440 MWe V-312 models and the rest the larger 1000 MWe units - two early models and the others V-320s. In 2009, almost half of Ukraine's electricity was produced by its nuclear plants.
In common with other VVER reactors, all of Ukraine's are routinely supplied with fuel by TVEL, although trials of 42 Westinghouse fuel assemblies are ongoing at the three South Ukraine units. This is taking place on an experimental basis, with final regulatory approval for the use of Westinghouse-supplied fuel outstanding.
Efforts to establish fuel manufacturing in Ukraine are an extension of this bid to break TVEL's technological monopoly on nuclear fuel supply. In addition to nuclear services, Ukraine also depends on Russia for much oil and gas, supplies of which have twice been cut off in a long-running payment dispute. Ukraine is able to mitigate this by supplying about 30% of the uranium that goes as the raw material for nuclear fuel. It also produces the zirconium alloys needed for fuel elements, but uranium enrichment and manufacture of finished fuel assemblies takes place in Russia.
TVEL was said to have won the tender as, unlike the other bidder Westinghouse, it had expressed willingness to invest its own money in the construction of the plant. The cost of constructing the fuel plant is put at some $212 million.
Vitaliy Lukianenko, the prime minister's press secretary, noted, "TVEL was unanimously supported during a competition for choosing the company to build the plant."
A condition of the tender is that Ukraine holds a controlling stake in the joint venture company that is to be established to manage the plant, despite TVEL likely to provide the majority of the funds to construct it. Another condition is the requirement for the transfer of technology for the manufacture of fuel assemblies under a non-exclusive licence by 2020 for reactors both in Ukraine and abroad.
According to Yuriy Nedashkovsky, president of national electricity generator Energoatom, nuclear fuel fabrication could start at the new plant in 2013. Initial production capacity of the plant will be 200 tonnes of uranium equivalent (tUe) per year of fuel rods and assemblies. In 2017, capacity to manufacture fuel pellets is set to increase to 400 tUe, while in 2020 the plant will be able to produce 400 tUe of fuel rods and assemblies.
Ukraine has 15 nuclear power reactors at four nuclear power plants (Khmelnitski, Rovno, South Ukraine and Zaporozhe), all operated by Energoatom. All the units are Russian VVER types, two being 440 MWe V-312 models and the rest the larger 1000 MWe units - two early models and the others V-320s. In 2009, almost half of Ukraine's electricity was produced by its nuclear plants.
In common with other VVER reactors, all of Ukraine's are routinely supplied with fuel by TVEL, although trials of 42 Westinghouse fuel assemblies are ongoing at the three South Ukraine units. This is taking place on an experimental basis, with final regulatory approval for the use of Westinghouse-supplied fuel outstanding.
Efforts to establish fuel manufacturing in Ukraine are an extension of this bid to break TVEL's technological monopoly on nuclear fuel supply. In addition to nuclear services, Ukraine also depends on Russia for much oil and gas, supplies of which have twice been cut off in a long-running payment dispute. Ukraine is able to mitigate this by supplying about 30% of the uranium that goes as the raw material for nuclear fuel. It also produces the zirconium alloys needed for fuel elements, but uranium enrichment and manufacture of finished fuel assemblies takes place in Russia.
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Iran: Computer Malware Attacked, Failed to Harm Nuclear Plant
Photo: AP
The reactor building of the Bushehr nuclear power plant is seen, just outside the southern city of Bushehr, Iran, 21 Aug 2010
from VOA News: Top Stories by Elizabeth Arrott
The head of Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant has confirmed a computer worm infected some of the facility's software, but says the plant's main systems are all safe.
Bushehr Project Director Mahmoud Jahfari told state media an attack by the Stuxnet computer worm has had no impact on the operations of the nuclear power plant.
Jahfari said investigations showed that some private software belonging to Bushehr employees had been contaminated. He added that authorities are working to counter the attacks.
Iranian authorities had earlier acknowledged the worm has infected systems throughout the country, but said it had caused no serious damage.
Stuxnet, a self-replicating worm, has distinguished itself as the first known to be designed to take over industrial control systems. It is able to penetrate computer systems not connected to the internet.
The worm was detected earlier this year and has spread around the world. Iran is believed to be the most heavily affected, suffering an estimated 60 percent of the attacks.
The director of information technology at the Iranian Ministry of Industries and Mines, Mahmud Liai, told state media "an electronic war has been launched against Iran."
Several cyber experts point to the sophistication of the worm as an argument it might be the work of a state program, while political observers suggest the same, given that Iran has suffered disproportionately.
Political Science Professor Said Sadek of the American University in Cairo.
"It is very clear there was an attempt to send a strong message to Iran and its nuclear program by informing the Iranian authorities that their program is not immune and that someone can enter and penetrate and destroy and sabotage the whole process," Sadek said.
Sadek says because of the secrecy of the Iranian government and its tendency to downplay negative developments, it is difficult to tell what the full impact of Stuxnet may be.
The Bushehr plant is not believed to play any significant role in what many Western nations believe is Iran's desire to build a nuclear weapon, a goal Tehran denies.
Bushehr Project Director Mahmoud Jahfari told state media an attack by the Stuxnet computer worm has had no impact on the operations of the nuclear power plant.
Jahfari said investigations showed that some private software belonging to Bushehr employees had been contaminated. He added that authorities are working to counter the attacks.
Iranian authorities had earlier acknowledged the worm has infected systems throughout the country, but said it had caused no serious damage.
Stuxnet, a self-replicating worm, has distinguished itself as the first known to be designed to take over industrial control systems. It is able to penetrate computer systems not connected to the internet.
The worm was detected earlier this year and has spread around the world. Iran is believed to be the most heavily affected, suffering an estimated 60 percent of the attacks.
The director of information technology at the Iranian Ministry of Industries and Mines, Mahmud Liai, told state media "an electronic war has been launched against Iran."
Several cyber experts point to the sophistication of the worm as an argument it might be the work of a state program, while political observers suggest the same, given that Iran has suffered disproportionately.
Political Science Professor Said Sadek of the American University in Cairo.
"It is very clear there was an attempt to send a strong message to Iran and its nuclear program by informing the Iranian authorities that their program is not immune and that someone can enter and penetrate and destroy and sabotage the whole process," Sadek said.
Sadek says because of the secrecy of the Iranian government and its tendency to downplay negative developments, it is difficult to tell what the full impact of Stuxnet may be.
The Bushehr plant is not believed to play any significant role in what many Western nations believe is Iran's desire to build a nuclear weapon, a goal Tehran denies.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Iran Confirms Stuxnet Has Infected Nuclear Power Plant (conceivablytech.com)
- Iran Fights Strong Virus Attacking Computers (nytimes.com)
- Stuxnet computer worm takes its toll on Iran, where nuclear plant may be target (venturebeat.com)
- Worm hits computers of staff at Iranian nuclear plant (ctv.ca)
- Stuxnet Infects 30,000 Industrial Computers In Iran (it.slashdot.org)
- Iran nuclear experts race to stop spread of Stuxnet computer worm (guardian.co.uk)
- Stuxnet Affecting Iran Power Plant (taragana.com)
- Malware hits personal computers of staff at Iranian nuclear plant (foxnews.com)
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Iran 'attacked' by computer worm Iran's nuclear agency trying to combat a virus capable of taking over systems that control power plants, media says.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/09/2010925135358149112.html
| Foreign media has speculated that the worm is aimed at disrupting the Bushehr nuclear plant [EPA] |
Experts from the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran met this week to discuss how to remove the malicious computer code, or worm, the semi-official Isna news agency reported on Friday.
No damage or disruption of nuclear facilities has yet been reported, however.
The computer worm, dubbed Stuxnet, can take over systems that control the inner workings of industrial plants.
Experts in Germany discovered the worm in July, and it has since shown up in a number of attacks - primarily in Iran, Indonesia, India and the US.
'Disrupting Bushehr'
Isna said the malware had spread throughout Iran, but did not name specific sites affected.
Foreign media reports have speculated the worm was aimed at disrupting Iran's first nuclear power plant, which is to go online in October in the southern port city of Bushehr.
The Russian-built plant will be internationally supervised, but world powers remain concerned that Iran wants to use its civil nuclear power programme as a cover for making weapons.
Iran denies such an aim and says its nuclear work is solely for peaceful purposes.
The destructive Stuxnet worm has surprised experts because it is the first one specifically created to take over industrial control systems, rather than just steal or manipulate data.
Speaking to Al Jazeera, Rik Ferguson, a senior security adviser at the computer security company Trend Micro, described the worm as "very sophisticated".
"It is designed both for information theft, looking for design documents and sending that information back to the controllers, and for disruptive purposes," he said.
"It can issue new commands or change commands used in manufacturing.
"It's difficult to say with any certainty who is behind it. There are multiple theories, and in all honesty, any of of them could be correct."
Western experts have said the worm's sophistication - and the fact that about 60 per cent of computers infected looked to be in Iran - pointed to a government-backed attack.
Washington is also tracking the worm, and the Department of Homeland Security is building specialised teams that can respond quickly to cyber emergencies at industrial facilities across the US.
Related articles by Zemanta
Labels:
Aljazeera,
Computer worm,
India,
Iran,
Malware,
Nuclear power,
Power station,
Trend Micro
Friday, September 24, 2010
Japanese Plant Begins Use of MOX Fuel
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20100924a6.html
A Japanese power company yesterday began operating an Okuma-based nuclear power reactor using fuel converted from weapon-capable plutonium, Kyodo News reported (see GSN, April 9).
Tokyo Electric Power Co. is expected in around five days to start running the mixed-oxide nuclear fuel reactor at full capacity. A government inspection of the reactor slated for Oct. 26 would precede its use for commercial power production, according to the firm.
The reactor was the third in Japan to begin using MOX fuel; the other two reactors are located in the towns of Genkai and Ikata (Kyodo News, Japan Times, Sept. 24).
Tokyo Electric Power Co. is expected in around five days to start running the mixed-oxide nuclear fuel reactor at full capacity. A government inspection of the reactor slated for Oct. 26 would precede its use for commercial power production, according to the firm.
The reactor was the third in Japan to begin using MOX fuel; the other two reactors are located in the towns of Genkai and Ikata (Kyodo News, Japan Times, Sept. 24).
| Online: The No. 3 reactor (second from left) at Tepco's Fukushima nuclear power plant was started up Thursday. KYODO PHOTO |
Tepco starts power output with MOX fuel
FUKUSHIMA (Kyodo) Power generation using plutonium-uranium mixed oxide fuel started at Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant Thursday morning, the utility said.
The No. 3 reactor at the plant in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, is the third in Japan for MOX fuel power generation, known as "pluthermal," with the others at Kyushu Electric Power Co.'s Genkai plant in Saga Prefecture and Shikoku Electric Power Co.'s Ikata plant in Ehime Prefecture.
Tepco will boost the reactor's power output to nearly 100 percent in about five days. It will then launch commercial operations after a final government inspection on Oct. 26, it said.
Pluthermal, a Japanese word that combines "plutonium" and "thermal," involves the use of MOX fuel, a mixture of uranium and plutonium reprocessed from spent uranium, to produce electricity.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Tepco starts power output with MOX fuel (search.japantimes.co.jp)
- Fukushima reactor receives MOX (search.japantimes.co.jp)
- Tepco starts 'pluthermal' reactor (search.japantimes.co.jp)
TVEL wins tender for Ukraine nuclear fuel plant The Ukrainian government has reportedly declared Russian nuclear fuel company TVEL the winner of the tender to construct a fuel manufacturing plant in Ukraine.
http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/ENF-TVEL_wins_tender_for_Ukraine_nuclear_fuel_plant-2409104.html
Ukraine's cabinet approved the Ministry of Fuel and Energy's proposal to construct the nuclear fuel plant at a meeting on 22 September, the country's national news agency Ukrinform reported.
TVEL was said to have won the tender as, unlike the other bidder Westinghouse, it had expressed willingness to invest its own money in the construction of the plant. The cost of constructing the fuel plant is put at some $212 million. Vitaliy Lukianenko, the prime minister’s press secretary, noted, "TVEL was unanimously supported during a competition for choosing the company to build the plant."
A condition of the tender is that Ukraine holds a controlling stake in the joint venture company that is to be established to manage the plant, despite TVEL likely to provide the majority of the funds to construct it. Another condition is the requirement for the transfer of technology for the manufacture of fuel assemblies under a non-exclusive licence by 2020 for reactors both in Ukraine and abroad.
According to Yuriy Nedashkovsky, president of national electricity generator Energoatom, nuclear fuel fabrication could start at the new plant in 2013. Initial production capacity of the plant will be 200 tonnes of uranium equivalent (tUe) per year of fuel rods and assemblies. In 2017, capacity to manufacture fuel pellets is set to increase to 400 tUe, while in 2020 the plant will be able to produce 400 tUe of fuel rods and assemblies.
Ukraine has 15 nuclear power reactors at four nuclear power plants (Khmelnitski, Rovno, South Ukraine and Zaporozhe), all operated by Energoatom. All the units are Russian VVER types, two being 440 MWe V-312 models and the rest the larger 1000 MWe units - two early models and the others V-320s. In 2009, almost half of Ukraine's electricity was produced by its nuclear plants.
In common with other VVER reactors, all of Ukraine's are routinely supplied with fuel by TVEL, although trials of 42 Westinghouse fuel assemblies are ongoing at the three South Ukraine units. This is taking place on an experimental basis, with final regulatory approval for the use of Westinghouse-supplied fuel outstanding.
Efforts to establish fuel manufactuing in Ukraine are an extension of this bid to break TVEL's technological monopoly on nuclear fuel supply. In addition to nuclear services, Ukraine also depends on Russia for much oil and gas, supplies of which have twice been cut off in a long-running payment dispute. Ukraine is able to mitigate this by supplying about 30% of the uranium that goes as the raw material for nuclear fuel. It also produces the zirconium alloys needed for fuel elements, but uranium enrichment and manufacture of finished fuel assemblies takes place in Russia.
Ukraine's cabinet approved the Ministry of Fuel and Energy's proposal to construct the nuclear fuel plant at a meeting on 22 September, the country's national news agency Ukrinform reported.
TVEL was said to have won the tender as, unlike the other bidder Westinghouse, it had expressed willingness to invest its own money in the construction of the plant. The cost of constructing the fuel plant is put at some $212 million. Vitaliy Lukianenko, the prime minister’s press secretary, noted, "TVEL was unanimously supported during a competition for choosing the company to build the plant."
A condition of the tender is that Ukraine holds a controlling stake in the joint venture company that is to be established to manage the plant, despite TVEL likely to provide the majority of the funds to construct it. Another condition is the requirement for the transfer of technology for the manufacture of fuel assemblies under a non-exclusive licence by 2020 for reactors both in Ukraine and abroad.
According to Yuriy Nedashkovsky, president of national electricity generator Energoatom, nuclear fuel fabrication could start at the new plant in 2013. Initial production capacity of the plant will be 200 tonnes of uranium equivalent (tUe) per year of fuel rods and assemblies. In 2017, capacity to manufacture fuel pellets is set to increase to 400 tUe, while in 2020 the plant will be able to produce 400 tUe of fuel rods and assemblies.
| Cooperation with OMZ Energoatom signed a memorandum of cooperation with Russia's OMZ on 23 September for cooperation in the manufacture of high-technology power engineering equipment, the Itar-Tass news agency reported. The memorandum also calls for the two companies to exchange information and cooperate in the maintenance of nuclear power plant equipment. |
In common with other VVER reactors, all of Ukraine's are routinely supplied with fuel by TVEL, although trials of 42 Westinghouse fuel assemblies are ongoing at the three South Ukraine units. This is taking place on an experimental basis, with final regulatory approval for the use of Westinghouse-supplied fuel outstanding.
Efforts to establish fuel manufactuing in Ukraine are an extension of this bid to break TVEL's technological monopoly on nuclear fuel supply. In addition to nuclear services, Ukraine also depends on Russia for much oil and gas, supplies of which have twice been cut off in a long-running payment dispute. Ukraine is able to mitigate this by supplying about 30% of the uranium that goes as the raw material for nuclear fuel. It also produces the zirconium alloys needed for fuel elements, but uranium enrichment and manufacture of finished fuel assemblies takes place in Russia.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)